Monday, September 29, 2008

DA@WORK 29 September - the realignment of politics has begun

DA@WORK 29 September

OUR NEW PRESIDENT
Election to the highest office in the land brought with it great and
profound responsibility, said Democratic Alliance chairman Joe
Seremane to the newly elected president, Kgalema Motlanthe.

THE REALIGNMENT OF POLITICS HAS BEGUN
Many of the ministers resigning, including Trevor Manuel, Mosiuoa
Lekota and Ronnie Kasrils, had served their office with distinction.

MLAMBO-NGCUKA WAS A LEADER ON HIV/AIDS
Deputy President Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka who resigned last Monday was a
great leader when it came to dealing with HIV/Aids

DA CHALLENGES NEW SAFETY AND SECURITY MINISTER TO DELIVER
An effective plan to tackle crime must be one of the new government's top.

QUOTE OF THE WEEK

The decay of our state institutions, caused by infighting in the ANC
and the use of these institutions to wage political battles, partly
has its origins in conflicts triggered by the arms deal. President
Motlanthe can help to arrest that decay, and prove his commitment to
fighting corruption, by appointing a commission without delay.

DA Leader Helen Zille, writing in SA Today, calls for the new
President to appoint a commission of inquiry into the arms deal as
part of his programme of action.

OUR NEW PRESIDENT

Election to the highest office in the land brought with it great and
profound responsibility, said Democratic Alliance chairman Joe
Seremane to the newly elected president, Kgalema Motlanthe.

Kgalema Motlanthe was duly elected in the National Assembly last
Thursday as South Africa's next President to replace President Thabo
Mbeki.

Seremane said Motlanthe's most important responsibility should be to
rise above party-political interests and put the needs and aspirations
of the people of South Africa first.

"The country is crying out for resolute and strong leadership to
reduce the level of anxiety currently felt by a great many of our
people who have been deeply unsettled by the governing party's
internal power struggles, now playing themselves out on a national and
international stage," he said.

There were urgent challenges facing South Africa which had to be dealt with.

The new administration should therefore do away with a focus on
internal power struggles and rather turn its attention to issues that
mattered most to ordinary South Africans.

These included rampant crime and lawlessness, widespread and
devastating poverty, chronic levels of unemployment, the continuing
negative effects of HIV/Aids, the gradual erosion of general
infrastructure, and poor or non-existent service delivery.

"Dealing with these problems needs to become the nation's number one
priority, not the politics of revenge and hatred which we have
witnessed from within the ANC's ranks over the past week," Seremane
said.

Responding last Monday to the suggestion that Motlanthe was likely to
be the ANC's nominee, DA leader Helen Zille said this was the best
case scenario under the circumstances.

"Minister Motlanthe is perhaps the most level-headed and reasonable of
all the politicians in the Zuma camp. Unlike Zuma, he dared to stick
his head above the parapet and rebuke the ANC Youth League for its
menacing statements that it would 'shoot to kill' for the ANC
president," Zille said.

She added that the DA would hold him to statements committing himself
to the independence of the judiciary should he be elected president.


THE REALIGNMENT OF POLITICS HAS BEGUN

The resignation of fourteen Cabinet ministers loyal to President
Mbeki shows deep dissatisfaction with the ANC's decision to recall
President Thabo Mbeki, the leader of the Democratic Alliance, Helen
Zille, said last Tuesday.

"It is clear that behind the display of unity, there is deep
dissatisfaction with the ANC NEC's decision to recall the president,"
she said.

Many of the ministers resigning, including Trevor Manuel, Mosiuoa
Lekota and Ronnie Kasrils, had served their office with distinction.

"That the ANC is willing to sacrifice them and risk our country's
stability in order to wreak revenge on the President, speaks volumes
about its lack of commitment to stable government."

She said it was now time to radically realign the political landscape.

"We must bring together all of those in the opposition and in the
ruling party who believe in the supremacy of the Constitution and
build an alternative to Jacob Zuma's ANC."

"The Democratic Alliance (DA) will take this process forward with
those who share our vision for a non-racial, democratic and prosperous
South Africa in which all are equal before the law."


MLAMBO-NGCUKA WAS A LEADER ON HIV/AIDS

Deputy President Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka who resigned last Monday was a
great leader when it came to dealing with HIV/Aids, said the
Democratic Alliance.

"Unlike other members of the Cabinet, Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka gave
vital leadership in the fight against HIV/Aids," said DA leader Helen
Zille.

"Under her stewardship, the SA National Aids Council was revived; and
it has made meaningful input into a plan to halve the rate of HIV
infections by 2011."

Zille said that, although it had seemed the Deputy President could
rise above faction struggles in the African National Congress, in the
end she seemed to have fallen victim to them.

"This is regrettable, as she would have been a steady hand on the
tiller during this time of political uncertainty."

Zille said Mlambo-Ngcuka had shown good economic judgement and
commendable political will in trying to halve unemployment and poverty
by 2014 and tackling skill, shortages.

"She successfully helped to launch, guide, and promote, at home and
abroad, the Joint Initiative for Priority Skills Acquisition (JIPSA)
and the Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative for South Africa
(Asgisa)."

Zille said some clouds would hang over Mlambo-Ngcuka's head regarding
her involvement in the "oilgate scandal" and her United Arab Emirates
trip at taxpayer's expense.

"In the main, however, she combined competence with common sense, and
her contribution to government will be missed," she said.


DA CHALLENGES NEW SAFETY AND SECURITY MINISTER TO DELIVER

The Democratic Alliance had identified ten key priorities for the new
Minister of Safety and Security, Nathi Mthethwa, party safety and
security spokesperson Dianne Kohler Barnard on Sunday.

"An effective plan to tackle crime must be one of the new government's
top concerns and the DA will be watching the new Minister's attention
to these priorities closely," she said.

"All South Africans have been affected by crime and all of us want to
see South Africa become a safer country, but with the SAPS conviction
rate for contact crimes at a lowly 19%, the Minister clearly has his
work cut out for him."

She challenged the new Minister on the top ten crime-related issues in
the country, including replacing National Police Commissioner Jackie
Selebi ; reinstating the specialised units such as the Narcotics
Bureau and the Family Violence, Child Abuse and Sexual Offences Units
and agreeing to retain the Scorpions.

"He must also commit himself to revamping the detective service with
high calibre officers and ensure that they have all the necessary
vehicles, equipment and resources as well as addressing border control
problems with a plan to seal our borders and enhance rural safety by
allocating sufficient personnel, suitable vehicles, radios and other
relevant equipment to border and rural areas," she said.

Other issues which needed addressing were backlogs at Forensic Science
Laboratories, violence in schools and improving the public's access to
crime statistics and the Independent Complaints Directorate (ICD) by
allocating it more funds and personnel.

"We call upon the new Minister to avoid taking cover behind a veil of
secrecy whenever tough questions are directed at him – he needs to
deliver on his responsibilities and simply accept that crime is one of
the most pressing issues for all South Africans," she said.


DID YOU KNOW

It was revealed in reply to a DA parliamentary question that South
African households owe local and district municipalities more than
R10-billion for services.

• At the end of June all 283 local and district municipalities across
the country were owed more than R18,4-billion by households,
businesses and various national government departments.

• Households were the major defaulters as they owed 60 percent
(R10,8-billion) of the total, followed by government departments at 20
percent (R3,6-billion) and businesses at 20 percent (R3,6-billion).

• "Of the total debt (of R18,4-billion), R15-billion had been
outstanding for over 90 days.

• Metros faced a similar problem - they were owed a combined fee of
more than R26,6-billion by private businesses, households and
government departments.

• Gauteng topped the list of provinces with outstanding debt - it was
owed R21,7-billion, followed by KwaZulu-Natal with R5,6-billion, the
Western Cape with R4,7-billion and the Free Sate with R3,8-billion.

• In the Eastern Cape, a total of R3,1-billion still needed to be
collected. In North West, R2,3-billion was outstanding, in Mpumalanga
R1,9-billion, in Limpopo R805 000, while Northern Cape municipalities
were owed R775 000.


MC BRIDE FIRED!
http://www.eyeoncrime.co.za/?q=node/442

HOW EFFECTIVE IS YOUR ARMED RESPONSE COMPANY?
http://www.eyeoncrime.co.za/?q=node/441\

TIME FOR FRESH THINKING?
http://www.eyeoncrime.co.za/?q=node/440\

Saturday, September 27, 2008

Helen Zille - SA Today: A programme of action for President Kgalema Motlanthe

A weekly letter from the Leader of the Democratic Alliance 26 September 2008
A programme of action for President Kgalema Motlanthe


The new President of South Africa, Kgalema Motlanthe, must act quickly
and decisively to gain the confidence of the South African nation, and
demonstrate that he can rise above the factional power-plays of the
ruling party and govern in the interests of the people as a whole.
He must show that he is the leader of the nation, rather than the
chosen proxy for the leader of a victorious faction in the ruling
party, at whose behest he was elected President. And for that to
happen, he must, at the outset of his term in office, do two things
which are in the national interest but which will not serve the
self-interest of ANC President Jacob Zuma and his clique.
Firstly, he must announce the establishment of a judicial commission
of inquiry into the arms deal, headed by a judge nominated by the
Chief Justice.
In his verdict on the matter between Jacob Zuma vs. the National
Director of Public Prosecutions, Judge Chris Nicholson said of the
arms deal: "Only a commission of enquiry can properly rid our land of
this cancer that is devouring the body politic and the reputation for
integrity built up so assiduously after the fall of Apartheid".
This proposal – a key recommendation in a judgment which,
incidentally, was hailed by the Zuma camp as proof that our judiciary
is independent and that constitutional democracy is flourishing –
should be adopted by President Motlanthe. In fact, it is only right
and just that he should use his constitutional power to appoint such a
commission, headed by a judge nominated by the Chief Justice, so that
we can get to the whole truth.
The decay of our state institutions, caused by infighting in the ANC
and the use of these institutions to wage political battles, partly
has its origins in conflicts triggered by the arms deal. President
Motlanthe can help to arrest that decay, and prove his commitment to
fighting corruption, by appointing a commission without delay.
Secondly, President Motlanthe must state unequivocally that under his
administration there will be no 'political solution' to Zuma's legal
problems. Any attempt to broker a special political deal for Zuma
outside of the courts, with presidential consent, would be illegal and
unconstitutional, and would violate the oath of office taken by
President Motlanthe when he was sworn in by the Chief Justice
yesterday.
It would be a betrayal of his conscience, and a gross infringement of
the principle of equality before the law, if President Motlanthe
abused his power either to facilitate or condone a political
settlement for Zuma.
There is prima facie evidence that the ANC President accepted 783
bribes totalling R4.2 million over ten years. Zuma cannot credibly
occupy any office of state until a court of law has had a chance to
weigh the evidence and establish his innocence. A short-circuiting of
that process – especially one engineered by the Presidency, or one to
which it turned a blind eye – would confirm that the "recall" of
former President Thabo Mbeki was a cynical ploy by Zuma's supporters
to get their man off the hook without him having to face his day in
court.
Of course, President Motlanthe will also have to calm the political
storm that erupted on Saturday when Mbeki was recalled, and which
rumbled this week, after it was announced that a third of the Cabinet
had resigned. The manner and timing of that announcement surprised
South Africans, temporarily devalued the rand, shook local financial
markets, and revealed the breakdown of trust between the executive and
the ruling party.
Given that several Ministers from the Mbeki administration have been
included in the reshuffled Cabinet, President Motlanthe must ensure
that whatever tensions still exist between the executive and the ANC
do not negatively impact on governance and service delivery.
It is encouraging to see Trevor Manuel return as Finance Minister. The
appointment of Barbara Hogan as Minister of Health is a welcome
development. The redeployment of her predecessor, Manto
Tshabalala-Msimang, as Minister in the Presidency, is hard to justify
given her track record of incompetence. Perhaps her political survival
can be explained by the fact that her husband, Mendi Msimang, is a
former ANC treasurer, and knows a great deal about the financial
dealings and misdealings of the ruling party.
We note with interest that Brigitte Mabandla has been moved to Public
Enterprises, and made way for Enver Surty as Minister of Justice. This
is a critical portfolio in relation to the National Prosecuting
Authority, because in terms of legislation, the Minister of Justice
can request information from the NPA about pending prosecutions. The
DA will be watching Minister Surty closely to ensure he defends the
independence of the NPA and allows it to get on with its
constitutional mandate of instituting prosecutions where there is
prima facie evidence against any person, irrespective of his or her
political status.
For the rest, President Motlanthe's Cabinet is something of a mixed
bag, and it will have its work cut out to restore the integrity of
government in the short space of seven to ten months, when new
elections will have to be held. Even so, it must begin clearing the
debris left by the Mbeki administration, notably its policy failures
on crime, HIV/Aids, and job creation.
On crime, President Motlanthe can send a powerful message to South
Africans by distancing his government from the kind of denialism that
led the former Minister of Safety and Security, Charles Nqakula (now
inexplicably redeployed to Defence) to say that citizens tired of
crime could either "whinge until they are blue in the face" or "simply
leave this country".
The President and his new Minister, Nathi Mthethwa, must also work to
bring down levels of crime, improve conviction rates, and expedite the
review of the criminal justice system.
In the health portfolio, Barbara Hogan will bring a measure of
competence that Tshabalala-Msimang sorely lacked. Her challenge now is
to rid the Ministry of the last vestiges of denialism that sowed
confusion about how HIV/Aids is transmitted, hamstrung the universal
rollout of antiretroviral medication, and diminished South Africa's
reputation internationally.
Finally, it is time for President Motlanthe to revisit the debate on
labour market reform initiated by Jacob Zuma last year, when the ANC
President called for greater labour market flexibility on the grounds
that restrictive labour laws were "counting out the poorest of the
poor" from the job market.
A considerable weight rests on President Motlanthe's shoulders. His
past words and deeds suggest that he might bring a level-headed
approach to government and exercise a stabilising effect on our
national politics which have been taken to the brink by his colleagues
in the ruling party. But he must distance himself immediately from
their power-plays, and govern in the interests of South Africa rather
than the interests of the Jacob Zuma camp.


Best Wishes

Friday, September 26, 2008

Ratepayers Newsletter - September 26 , 2008

Weekly news bulletin of interest to ratepayers and tax-payers
Number 3
Friday September 26, 2008

In Durban, there is still tremendous confusion about what charges are
being levied for what. Here is an attempt to explain:
1. Your property has been given a market-related valuation.
2. Your rates are worked out as .009% of that valuation. Therefore
a R1 million property will pay rates of R9 000 per year, divided into
twelve months.
3. The first R120 000 of your property is rates-free, so you must
calculate your rates on the remainder. This is also true of pensioners'
rebates and other concessions.
4. Sewage and refuse are worked out as a percentage of your rates -
20% and 11% respectively. So, if your rates are R800 per month, 20% of
that is your sewage and 11% of that is your refuse removal.

However, this is where problems are creeping in. Many properties in
Durban do not have city sewage. The situation has arisen, therefore,
that even though the sewage is not individually charged, it is still
included in your rates. So, even people who do not have sewage are
being charged for it. People who have these green Wheelie Bin contracts
with the city are also still being charged for refuse removal as this is
part of their rates. A resident of Durban has asked the municipality
for an explanation as to how these charges can attract VAT, as it is
illegal to charge VAT on a tax. We are still waiting for a satisfactory
response from the city.

These are just some of the anomalies that are arising because of the new
rates policy. Anyone with other examples of problems with this new
billing system are asked to contact us. The Combined Ratepayers
Association (CRA) is gathering evidence about all these shortcomings in
order to call for a rethink of this legislation.

The CRA is still waiting for a response from the Mayor and the Speaker
as a result of last week's meeting - this will be followed up soon.
Lilian Develing of the Hillcrest Ratepayers Association has been going
through the evaluation roll and has turned up many discrepancies that
were brought to the council's attention up to four years ago. They have
still not been corrected. The same company that did Durban's valuations
were also responsible for doing the valuations for Nelson Mandela Bay
Metro (Port Elizabeth) and a recent newspaper report from the Eastern
Cape identified the process as being 'chaotic'. It appears that PE,
along with other towns that had their valuations done by the same
company, are experiencing the same problems as Durban.

With regard to the evaluations process, here is what you can do:
1. If you do not agree with the valuation, lodge an objection.
2. If the objection is overruled, you must ask in writing for an
explanation as to why the objection was overruled.
3. Once you have received the reason in writing, you can lodge an
appeal. You have thirty days to do so.
4. Regardless of where you are in the above process, it is
recommended that you call a formal dispute with the municipality over
your bill. This will prevent the municipality from taking any action
against you if you do not pay your full account.

For more information on your rights and responsibilities as a ratepayer,
go to the CRA website www.cra-durban.co.za
<http://www.cra-durban.co.za/>

PS - Residents who are dissatisfied with municipal service are also
urged to cancel their subscription to MetroBeat.

Any ratepayers association from anywhere in South Africa is also
encouraged to send their ratepayers' news to the writer of this
newsletter, so that it can be gathered into the weekly bulletin.

What's happening across South Africa:

National Ratepayers and Taxpayers news:

There is growing resistance all over South Africa to municipal
mismanagement, and there is growing conviction that withholding rates
and taxes is the only option left to compel municipalities to improve
their service delivery and accountability to the public. There have
been several success stories in this regard, the most recent being Mooi
River. The number of towns declaring disputes against their management
is growing, with three more having joined in this week (East London,
Kareedouw and Frankfort).

Many towns across South Africa have declared disputes with their local
municipalities and are withholding rates, with varying degrees of
success. However, until recently several Constitutional experts were
quoted as saying that withholding rates is illegal. This has now
changed, as these experts now claim that their remarks have been
mis-interpreted. There are indeed grounds for the withholding of rates.
Rates can be redirected in the case of an 'emergency'. What constitutes
an emergency, no-one yet knows. The major point with all these legal
experts, is that the new municipal laws have been insufficiently tested
and therefore are still open to interpretation. Despite almost fifty
towns being in dispute across South Africa, and many of them withholding
rates completely, not one action by any municipality against these
disputers has been successful.

Bethlehem: an internal auditor in the Bethlehem Municipality recently
wrote a letter to the council, in which he stated that the town's
finances were in such disarray that 'God has forsaken this place'. This
is being used as a reason why the Bethlehem community are about to
declare a dispute with their municipality, citing the complete breakdown
of services in the town as a reason.

There are many other issues of relevance to ratepayers across South
Africa, and we will attempt to keep you informed on a weekly basis.
Please forward this mail to anyone who might be interested in this news.
If you want back-copies of this bulletin, please contact the writer at
nikimoore@webstorm.co.za

Enviro-Matters: Issue 5

SEPTEMBER 2008 – ISSUE #5
In this issue:
INTRODUCTORY LETTER

DA SUPPORTS THE ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AMENDMENT BILL

DA SUPPORTS THE PROTECTED AREAS AMENDMENT BILL

DA DISAPPOINTED BY DECISION TO MINE WILD COAST

HIGH VACANCY RATE FOR EIA STAFF IN GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS

DA DISAPPOINTED THAT G8 DID NOT COMMIT TO MORE DRAMATIC REDUCTION IN
CARBON EMISSIONS

WHY HAS THE MINISTER NOT CONCLUDED AIRPORT APPEALS PROCESS?

DA QUESTIONS SUSPENSION OF OFFICIALS INVOLVED WITH FLAMINGOS AT KAMFERS DAM

DA REACTS TO SUSPENSION OF THE BOARD OF EZEMVELO KZN WILDLIFE

DA CALLS FOR COMMISSION OF INQUIRY INTO GAUTENG DEVELOPMENTS

DA CALLS FOR RESIGNATION OF NORTH WEST PARKS AND TOURISM BOARD

INTRODUCTORY LETTER

Greetings

This edition of Enviro Matters comes to you at a time of considerable
upheavals in government. By the time you read this, there will be a
new President of the Republic and, in the days ahead, a number of new
Cabinet appointments will be made. In this time of uncertainty, the
oversight of government must continue. Political changes cannot be
allowed to undermine service delivery on the ground.

The Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism has a new
Director-General, Mrs. Nosipho Jezile-Ngcaba. Mrs Jezile-Ngcaba had
previously been the acting DG of the Department since the departure of
Ms Pam Yako earlier in the year. I am confident that Mrs Jezile-Ngcaba
is the correct person for this challenging position. At the time of
her appointment I encouraged Mrs Jezile-Ngcaba to mainstream the
National Strategy on Sustainable Development, yet to be approved by
Cabinet, across all departments in government. This matter has been
dragging on for far too long.

One of the most significant announcements by government in recent
months was that a series of carbon taxes are being considered. I have
welcomed this initiative. Details remain sketchy, but I have suggested
that government should, among other things, ensure that revenues from
carbon taxes are ring-fenced for projects involving renewable energy,
energy efficiency, and research and development. If government is
going to induce behaviour-change, then producers and consumers must
have the assurance that their taxes are being spent on projects that
will reduce the country's carbon footprint.

This edition of Enviro Matters includes news from the DA in a number
of provinces reflecting the variety of issues that the party is taking
up, and the role that our public representatives are playing in
holding the government to account. Our increased focus on matters
related to improving environmental protection and sustainable
development is reflected in the fact that, thus far this year, the
Minister of Environmental Affairs has been asked exactly 100
parliamentary questions, making him one of the top three most
questioned Ministers by the DA in parliament.

Kind Regards

Gareth Morgan MP

DA SPOKESPERSON ON ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS

Back to menu >>


DA SUPPORTS THE ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AMENDMENT BILL

In September, the Democratic Alliance supported the passing of the
Environmental Laws Amendment Bill.

Speaking in parliament, DA spokesperson on environmental affairs
Gareth Morgan noted that the Bill simultaneously amended six pieces of
environmental legislation.

"Several of the bills, including the Atmospheric Pollution Prevention
Act, the Environment Conservation Act, National Environmental
Management Amendment (NEMA) and the Protected Areas Act are amended to
increase penalties for offences. It is common cause that higher
penalties will act as a greater deterrent for individuals or entities
that consider perpetrating environmental crimes. In most cases, both
the monetary fines and jail sentences are significantly ramped up, and
the DA fully supports these steps."

Morgan said that the issue of remedial costs for pollution was the
subject of considerable debate in the committee.

"Under the amendment bill, if a person fails to comply with a
directive to remediate pollution the authorities are able to take
measures to rectify the situation, which includes claiming
anticipatory costs. The DA was concerned with the open-ended nature of
the original proposed amendment, but supported it in principle. I am
considerably more comfortable with it now that it has limited costs to
'costs for reasonable remedial measures to be undertaken'," he said.

"The new Bill also guarantees that retrospective application is
ensured. I hope that the numerous polluters who have not taken
responsibility for pollution prior to NEMA being promulgated take
action before the Green Scorpions come knocking on their doors."

Morgan congratulated the new Head of the Environmental Management
Inspectorate, Mrs Frances Craigie on her appointment, saying that he
hoped she would take the Green Scorpions forward, and concentrate on
prosecuting those entities that commit pollution-related crimes.

"I would also like to suggest that the work of training magistrates
about the intricacies of environmental law be further advanced. It is
one thing having good environmental laws that exist on paper. We need
the judiciary to help enforce them," he said.

Back to menu >>

DA SUPPORTS THE PROTECTED AREAS AMENDMENT BILL

In a debate in the National Assembly in September, DA spokesperson on
environmental affairs, Gareth Morgan said that South Africa's
protected areas were national assets and a haven for biodiversity and
heritage.

"It is important that our parks are well funded, that they create
opportunities for wealth creation, and that opportunities to access
these parks, particularly from poor communities, are maximised," said
Morgan.

Morgan said that one of the amendments contained in the Bill provided
for flight corridors over protected areas to be regulated.

The DA had argued that the original proposed provisions in the Bill
were not strict enough, as they provided too much discretion to park
authorities. However, it now provides for the need for environmental
authorisations for flight corridors in terms of section 24 of the
NEMA.

"This means that the parks will be obliged to use an EIA or similar
environmental management tool when establishing such corridors," said
Morgan.

Morgan said that the clause related to provisions for the dissolution
of SANParks caused considerable consternation from many members of the
public who made submissions, mainly because it conceivably allowed for
national parks to be transferred to private entities.

"My personal opinion is that there was no malicious intent by the
Department in its original drafting, as SANParks needed to comply with
the Income Tax Act in this regard. But, I agreed that the provision
needed to be strengthened, and the committee subsequently amended the
clause to reflect that, if dissolution occurred, the assets would be
transferred to the State or to an equivalent Schedule 3A Public Entity
contemplated in the PFMA."

"For good measure, the committee also added that, if SANParks was ever
to be wound up, it should be done by an Act of Parliament. All
stakeholders, I believe, were satisfied with these amendments which
reinforce the view that our national parks belong to all South
Africans," said Morgan.


Back to menu >>


DA DISAPPOINTED BY DECISION TO MINE WILD COAST


In August, the DA noted with disappointment the decision by the
Department of Minerals and Energy to grant a right to a mining company
that intended to mine a portion of land in Xolobeni in the Eastern
Cape.

"The granting of this mining right will see the creation of only a few
hundred jobs at most, and it will negate the sustainable option of job
creation on a massive level through opportunities from eco-tourism,"
said the Leader of the Opposition in parliament, Sandra Botha.

Since the initial announcement by the Minister of Minerals and Energy,
it appeared that the Minister was beginning to reconsider her decision
to grant the mining right. This followed two recent visits by the
Minister to the affected area.

Meanwhile DA spokesperson on environmental affairs Gareth Morgan has
raised questions about why the Minister of Environmental Affairs and
Tourism has been so quiet on this issue. He said that the Minister's
legacy was at stake if the mining went ahead.

Morgan drew attention to various conservation and tourism projects
that were either underway or had been mooted by the Department of
Environmental Affairs and Tourism, including the establishment of the
Pondoland National Park. He also reminded the Minister of a reply to a
DA parliamentary question in September 2007, in which the Minister
noted that SA Tourism had conducted a Global Competitiveness Study
which identified the lower and upper Wild Coast as priority areas for
tourism development.

"It is worth remembering the strong words of the former Minister of
Environmental Affairs, Valli Moosa, who said on the matter of mining
the Wild Coast that it would 'irreparably ruin the area and spell the
death of an eco-tourism asset whose long-term sustainability far
outweighs the economic benefits of mining'", said Morgan.

"The DA agrees with the former Minister."

Back to menu >>

HIGH VACANCY RATE FOR EIA STAFF IN GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS

In reply to a DA parliamentary question, it was revealed that an
unacceptably high number of vacancies persist in the government
departments that deal with Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
applications. 44% of posts established to process EIAs are currently
vacant.

"The vacancies are particularly acute in a number of provinces
including Limpopo (73% vacancy rate), Mpumalanga (63% vacancy rate),
Free State (52% vacancy rate), Gauteng (44% vacancy rate), and North
West (43% vacancy rate). In total, there are 138 posts standing
unfilled across South Africa. KZN province did not return figures, but
a year ago the vacancy rate was approximately 50%," said DA
spokesperson on environmental affairs Gareth Morgan.

"The answer to this parliamentary question shows that problems with
slow EIAs are not necessarily with the instruments themselves, but
also with incapacity of the departments that assess applications."

Morgan said that the national department had several initiatives to
train EIA practitioners, also known as Environment Officer Cadres, in
the provinces, but it is clear that more needed to be done.

"These officers possess scarce skills, and the Minister needs to
redouble efforts to encourage more graduates to enter this field. As
the Minister acknowledges, competition with the private sector for
these skills is fierce, so it is self-evident that the conditions of
service of these practitioners needs to be improved."

Morgan said that, in light of the 2006 State of the Environment
Report, which noted a general decline in the health of South Africa's
environment, it was imperative that these positions in the provinces
be filled as soon as possible.

Back to menu >>

DA DISAPPOINTED THAT G8 DID NOT COMMIT TO MORE DRAMATIC REDUCTION IN
CARBON EMISSIONS

The DA expressed its disappointment with the response of G8 leaders to
the climate change challenge in July.

"Their commitment to a 50% reduction in emissions by 2050 is
meaningless without a base year," said member of the G8+5 climate
dialogue and DA spokesperson on environmental affairs Gareth Morgan.

"Further, if these major emitters are to subscribe to the science of
climate change, then their reductions should be even greater by 2050."

Morgan said that the window of opportunity for a substantial climate
change response was closing and that it had been hoped that the G8
summit would set the groundwork for the negotiations leading up to the
next Conference of the Parties in Copenhagen in late 2009.

"The principle of historic and differentiated responsibility means
that developed countries need to take on the bulk of absolute
reductions in emissions through mitigation targets. While developing
countries should take some mitigation action in the period going
forward, the announcement by the G8 leaders is not going to provide
the necessary confidence building measures that developing countries
require to enter into a meaningful post-2012 climate framework," he
said.

Morgan said that legislators from the G8+5, including a cross-party
delegation from South Africa, met the week prior to the G8 Heads of
State Meeting, and drew up a substantial communiqué.

"This was a consensus document that, among other things, called on the
G8 to commit to mid-term targets as well as a long term goal. Most
notably, our communiqué called for a 25-40% reduction in emissions on
1990 levels by 2020. This has been ignored by the G8 leaders, despite
legislators from their own countries calling for it," he said.

"The DA believes that the South African government has taken the
correct positions on these matters, and calls on the Minister of
Environmental Affairs and Tourism to continue his efforts at ensuring
greater commitments by the developed world to dealing with climate
change."

In related news, Morgan had the opportunity to question former UK
Prime Minister Tony Blair at the G8+5 Climate Dialogue on matters
related to funding for adaptation to climate change. Blair is now
involved in an initiative to get CEOs of major corporations interested
in responding to climate change.

Back to menu >>

WHY HAS THE MINISTER NOT CONCLUDED AIRPORT APPEALS PROCESS?

The DA has taken the Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism
Marthinus van Schalkwyk to task for not ruling on the appeals against
the record of decision for the construction of the new King Shaka
International airport, despite the deadline for appeals having been
closed more than nine months ago. Meanwhile, the construction of the
airport has been steaming ahead.

DA spokesperson on environmental affairs Gareth Morgan said in
parliament in June that the delay was making a mockery of the EIA
process.

"The Minister is making a ruling on the appeals against the
development application of ACSA, essentially a state-owned entity. The
longer this process drags out, the more it looks like he is favouring
an organ of state," said Morgan.

In late August, Morgan wrote to the Minister urging him to rule on the appeals.

"Surely it is better to cause remedial action on any problem areas as
soon as possible. A ruling on the appeals sooner rather than later
would allow stakeholders to engage with the substance of your ruling."

Morgan assured the Minister that his attempts to pursue the matter
were motivated by attempting to create a 'win-win situation'.

"My belief is that, the longer your ruling is delayed, the harder it
becomes to seek remedial efforts, if such efforts are required," wrote
Morgan.

The Minister responded in writing in September noting that he shared
Morgan's concern regarding the time it was taking to consider the
appeals.

"You will appreciate that this matter is complex and also very costly
and that, like you, I am also attempting to find a 'win-win' solution.
Balancing the respective arguments and rights of the parties to this
decision requires adequate consideration of all the facts and
circumstances," said Van Schalkwyk

"Please be assured however that I will nevertheless endeavour to
expedite my decision on this matter as far as is possible," wrote the
Minister.

Back to menu >>

DA QUESTIONS SUSPENSION OF OFFICIALS INVOLVED WITH FLAMINGOS AT KAMFERS DAM

In August, the DA in the Northern Cape questioned the suspension of
three senior officials from the Department of Tourism, Environment and
Nature Conservation in the province.

"It is believed that these officials were suspended because of their
alleged involvement, both on a personal and departmental level, in the
flamingo saga at Kamfers Dam," said DA spokesperson on conservation in
the Northern Cape Dr Chris Liebenberg.

"The area adjacent to Kamfers Dam, home to the largest population of
flamingos in South Africa, is subject to a development application.
The current water quality of the dam is also a matter of considerable
concern."

"The question is, was their suspension politically motivated and, if
so, why? And secondly, what promises were made to the developers by
politicians?" said Liebenberg.

In light of the suspension of these officials, DA spokesperson on
environmental affairs Gareth Morgan asked the Minister of
Environmental Affairs whether he would consider becoming the competent
authority for this particular development application.

The Minister replied, noting that this application did not trigger any
of the requirements in section 24C of the National Environmental
Management Act which would make it an issue of national competency.

DA spokesperson on water affairs Mpowele Swathe subsequently
questioned the Minister of Water Affairs and Forestry on what efforts
were being taken to mitigate the flow of partially treated sewage into
Kamfers Dam. The Minister responded that short term 'crisis
interventions' were currently underway and that long term
interventions were in an integrated planning stage.

Back to menu >>


DA REACTS TO SUSPENSION OF THE BOARD OF EZEMVELO KZN WILDLIFE

The DA welcomed the suspension in late September of the entire board
of Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife following recent disclosures in the
provincial legislature that nearly 50 Ezemvelo staff members would
face criminal prosecution or disciplinary action for fraud, corruption
and other offences.

"The controversy and mismanagement surrounding this once prized
provincial asset has boiled over and accountability should not be
limited to Ezemvelo board members," said DA spokesperson on
conservation in KZN Margaret Ambler-Moore.

"The MEC for Agriculture and Environmental Affairs, Mr Mthimkhulu,
must shoulder his share of responsibility for Ezemvelo's troubles and
for any public monies that may have been misappropriated as a result
of inaction on his part."

In answer to a parliamentary question in May 2005, the DA learnt that
board members had been transacting with Ezemvelo. Mr P. Shangase
received R378 000 over an 18 month period for services provided to
Ezemvelo by his company AP Shangase and Associates. Mr I. Lax received
R32 250 in that year for legal services he provided to Ezemvelo.

"The official written response from the then – MEC, Mr Ndabandaba, and
HOD Dr Mjwara was that 'there has never been a policy which stipulates
that members of the board may not supply services to the organisation
(Ezemvelo)'. This was strongly condemned by the DA in portfolio
committee meetings at the time, but as a result of inaction by
successive MECs, HODs and the Agriculture Department, Mr Shangase, Mr
Lax and/or other board members have been free to contract with the
same organisation that they serve in a fiduciary capacity for the last
three years," said Ambler-Moore.

"It is tragic that a once world-renowned conservation agency has seen
its entire board suspended, its CEO demoted for drunk driving, and 47
employees fingered for fraud and theft," she said.

"The future leadership of Ezemvelo must recapture the commitment to
conservation that was a hallmark of previous conservation agencies in
the province."

Back to menu >>

DA CALLS FOR COMMISSION OF INQUIRY INTO GAUTENG DEVELOPMENTS

The DA has once again called on Gauteng Premier Mbhazima Shilowa to
initiate a commission of inquiry into various records of decisions
made by MEC for Agriculture, Conservation and Environment, Khabisi
Mosunkutu. A similar request was made of the Premier earlier this
year, however, he said there was no basis for such an inquiry.

The party had earlier accused Mosunkutu of overruling environmental
expert advice in his department against particular developments, in
some cases after personally meeting developers.

The renewed call for a commission of inquiry followed Gauteng
integrity commissioner Jules Browde's recent finding that evidence
presented "demanded a comprehensive inquiry" into decisions made by
the MEC. Browde had been investigating allegations that Mosunkutu had
earlier this year threatened two DA MPLs, Hendrika Kruger and Paul
Willemburg, and had ejected them from a media briefing.

MEC Mosunkutu was reported to have said to the DA MPLs in the briefing
in question: "Now, you know I am the sort of person who does not issue
a warning and not carry it out. I hope, friends, you have — eh —
sufficient resources…If you don't, (and you) go and lose, and you lose
spectacularly, (the) possibility is that I might take your house. I
will also help you look for an alternative for your kids, in some
orphanage, because that's (only fair). But I might just take your
house, or your car, if you don't have sufficient resources. So I hope
you have enough."

Mosunkutu was found to have breached the code of conduct and
subsequently apologised.

"A proper inquiry is needed into this department; otherwise the cloud
of suspicion will persist. Shilowa should heed the opinion of Browde
and set up an inquiry as soon as possible," said DA leader in the
Gauteng legislature Jack Bloom.

Back to menu >>

DA CALLS FOR RESIGNATION OF NORTH WEST PARKS AND TOURISM BOARD

In September, the DA called for the resignation of the members of the
North West Parks and Tourism Board. This followed a report of the
Auditor-General (AG) on the findings of an investigation into the
possible conflict of interest by officials of the Board relating to
the procurement of goods and services.

The investigation had been initiated by the Public Accounts Committee
after DA provincial leader and spokesperson for conservation in the
North West Chris Hattingh raised various allegations in the committee
in June 2007.

"The AG's report confirmed, among other things, that various employees
of the Board had not declared their interests in companies and/or
close corporations, nor had they received approval to perform other
remunerative work," said Hattingh.

"Six entities connected to employees of the North-West Parks and
Tourism Board had been found to be doing business with the Board."

The DA welcomed the recommendation that all employees listed in the
report should declare interest in companies or close corporations.

"The report of the AG indicates gross anomalies. It is a disgrace to
see a government entity that people have placed so much trust and
faith in, exploit this trust," said Hattingh.

"If the Board fails to resign, the DA will put forward a motion in the
legislature calling for their immediate replacement."

Back to menu >>


DID YOU KNOW?
How does paper wastage contribute to our carbon footprint?
• Worldwide, the pulp and paper industry is the fifth largest
industrial consumer of energy.
• Producing recycled paper uses up to 70% less energy than virgin
paper, as well as using far less water.
• According to environmental charities, for every tonne of 100%
post-consumer recycled paper purchased instead of virgin fibre paper,
we save at least 30,000 litres of water and 3000 - 4000 KWh of
electricity, which is enough power to run an average three bedroom
house for one year.
• Nearly 80% of the world's original old growth forests have been
logged or severely degraded.
• 34% of documents printed are used for less than 5 minutes, while 22%
are never used.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

ZILLE - MBEKI'S OUSTING MAY SIGNAL END OF THE ANC'S DOMINANCE

STATEMENT BY HELEN ZILLE

LEADER OF THE DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE

Mbeki's ousting may signal end of the ANC's dominance

Release, immediate: Sunday, 21 September 2008

President Mbeki made a dignified resignation speech. He used the
opportunity to spell out the points of his Presidency for which he
wishes to be remembered, and to differ with the opinion expressed by
Judge Chris Nicholson in the judgment of 12 September 2008. This
judgment gave the Jacob Zuma faction the reason it had been seeking
for a long time to oust President Mbeki and seize power so that they
can impose a political solution to avoid Zuma having to face his day
in court.

In his statement, Mbeki demonstrated respect for a court judgment,
even though he has not been given a chance to state his case in court.
This contrasts sharply with the response of Jacob Zuma and his
followers, who only respect court judgments that are in their favour,
and vilify and defy the judiciary if they are not.

The dignified way in which Thabo Mbeki handled his exit gives us hope
that there will be some continuity in government between now and the
next election. We must now look ahead and consider what is in the best
interests of our country. Above all else, it is crucial that there is
stability in government. An all out purge of Ministers, particularly
those that have carried out their jobs effectively, would have
disastrous consequences for delivery. This must be avoided at all
costs.

The President's forced resignation is clearly motivated by the ANC's
stated aim to find a 'political solution' to Jacob Zuma's legal
problems. The incoming President must make a commitment that he or she
will not interfere with the National Prosecuting Authority's decision
to appeal Judge Chris Nicholson's judgment or any further efforts by
the NPA to prosecute Jacob Zuma for the alleged 783 bribes he
received.

Mbeki's conciliatory tone belies the deep divisions in the ruling
party; his ousting may prove to be the undoing of the ANC's electoral
dominance. We must now show South Africa that there is an alternative
to the political thuggery that has come to characterise the ANC.

The vicious way in which Mbeki was forced out by his enemies has
shocked the nation. As a result, the ANC stands irrevocably divided
and so do its supporters. Ironically President Mbeki spoke about the
value of Ubuntu, which has clearly been denied to him by his own
party.

I have long called for a realignment of politics to unite all South
Africans who wish to defend the constitution and the gains of our
democracy. We must stand together to resist the war-talking
anti-constitutionalists that have taken over the ANC. This time is now
upon us. We will redouble our efforts to bring together all those who
believe in the Constitution to challenge the power hunger and power
abuse of Jacob Zuma's ANC.

President Mbeki leaves a chequered legacy. His denialism of HIV/Aids
and crime cost thousands of lives; he undermined his own vision of an
African renaissance by siding with despots on the continent; and, by
eschewing Nelson Mandela's nation-building project, he has left South
Africa more divided than when he assumed office.

But, for all his faults, Thabo Mbeki must be praised for his sound
stewardship of the economy. Under his watch, South Africa experienced
its longest sustained period of economic growth, albeit in a benign
international economic climate.

All new democracies go through periods of political turbulence. The
future depends on how we react to the tumult. This is a time for bold
leadership and fresh thinking. If we make the right decisions, South
Africa's democracy can emerge stronger than before. This is our
challenge and we must not fail.

Monday, September 22, 2008

DA@WORK 22 September - SA: the road ahead

DA@WORK 22 September

MBEKI'S OUSTING MAY SIGNAL END OF ANC'S DOMINANCE
President Thabo Mbeki's dignified resignation speech has helped calm
South Africans in the wake of his departure from office. It was
crucial for Mbeki to convey a message that there would be stability in
government after his departure.

ZUMA JUDGEMENT: THE ROAD AHEAD
A number of measures could be taken to ensure transgressors were held
to account, that justice was served and that independent state
institutions were protected from undue political influence.

FLAWED INVESTIGATIONS FREE CRIMINALS
Failure by government to address weaknesses in the police's detective
service has allowed criminals to go unpunished.

COULD NEW DEAL BE THE BEGINNING OF STABILITY IN ZIM?
While the signing of the deal was the first significant ray of hope
for the future stability of Zimbabwe, Leon voiced concerned about the
durability of the deal.

QUOTE OF THE WEEK

The success of our Paralympics team in Beijing is a shining example of
the extraordinary talent that South Africa possesses - our
Paralympians have shown incredible determination, perseverance and
dedication throughout the games – values which all South Africans
should emulate in our efforts to build a prosperous and winning
nation.

James Masango congratulates the South African paralymic team on their
stellar performance in at the 2008 Paralympic Games in Beijing -the
team finished in sixth position with 21 gold medals, 3 silver medals
and 6 bronze medals.

MBEKI'S OUSTING MAY SIGNAL END OF ANC'S DOMINANCE

President Thabo Mbeki's dignified resignation speech has helped calm
South Africans in the wake of his departure from office, Democratic
Alliance leader Helen Zille said on Sunday.

She said that Mbeki had used his live resignation speech on television
as the opportunity to spell out the legacy for which he would like to
be remembered and to differ with Judge Chris Nicholson's inference
that HE may have interfered in the National Prosecuting Authority's
prosecution of Zuma.

"This judgment gave the Zuma faction the reason it had been seeking
for a long time to oust Mbeki and seize power so that they can impose
a political solution to avoid Zuma having to face his day in court,"
she said.

"The dignified way in which Thabo Mbeki handled his exit gives us hope
that there will be some continuity in government between now and the
next election," she said in a statement.

It was crucial for Mbeki to convey a message that there would be
stability in government after his departure.

"We must now look ahead and consider what is in the best interests of
our country," she said.

While Mbeki had made some blunders, it was important not to lose sight
of his achievements.

"For all his faults, Thabo Mbeki must be praised for his sound
stewardship of the economy - under his watch, South Africa experienced
its longest sustained period of economic growth, albeit in a benign
international economic climate," she said.

Zille reiterated her view that the ANC's decision to remove Mbeki was
motivated by the party's desire to protect its President, Jacob Zuma,
from prosecution.

"The President's forced resignation is clearly motivated by the ANC's
stated aim to find a 'political solution' to Jacob Zuma's legal
problems," she said.

"The incoming president must make a commitment that he or she will not
interfere with the NPA's decision to appeal Judge Nicholson's judgment
or any further efforts by the NPA to prosecute Jacob Zuma for the 783
alleged bribes he received."

The vicious way in which Mbeki was forced out by his enemies had
shocked the nation and as a result, the ANC stood irrevocably divided,
as did its supporters.

"Ironically, President Mbeki spoke about the value of Ubuntu, which
has clearly been denied to him by his own party," said Zille.

She said that Mbeki's conciliatory tone belied the deep divisions in
the ruling party and that his ousting may prove to be the undoing of
the ANC's electoral dominance.

"We must now show South Africa that there is an alternative to the
political thuggery that has come to characterise the ANC."

"I have long called for a realignment of politics to unite all South
Africans who wish to defend the constitution and the gains of our
democracy," she said.

"We must stand together to resist the war-talking
anti-constitutionalists that have taken over the ANC and we will
redouble our efforts to bring together all those who believe in the
Constitution to challenge the power hunger and power abuse of Jacob
Zuma's ANC."

"All new democracies go through periods of political turbulence and
the future depends on how we react to the tumult," Zille said.

This was a time for bold leadership and fresh thinking.

"If we make the right decisions, South Africa's democracy can emerge
stronger than before. This is our challenge and we must not fail."


ZUMA JUDGEMENT: THE ROAD AHEAD

In a press conference last Tuesday, DA leader Helen Zille said that
the verdict delivered by Judge Chris Nicholson in the Pietermaritzburg
High Court the preceding Friday raised key questions about the
corruption cancer at the heart of government

She outlined four key issues arising from the judgement which she said
should be given due consideration.

"Firstly, it is clearer than ever that a judicial commission of
inquiry is the only way we are going to get to the truth of the arms
deal," she said.

This was a demand the DA had been making from the start. DA
parliamentary leader Sandra Botha last Monday submitted a motion to
Parliament calling for a debate on the establishment of a commission
of enquiry into the arms deal.

"We must get to the truth because we cannot build our future as a
constitutional democracy when government leaders block all means of
establishing whether or not they are corrupt. "

"Secondly, the judgment suggests that President Thabo Mbeki influenced
the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) in his war against his
designated successor, Jacob Zuma."

This matter was subsequently addressed by Mbeki in his resignation speech.

"Thirdly and most importantly, Jacob Zuma has not been acquitted of
corruption charges," Zille said.

"A court of law has yet to determine whether Zuma is guilty or
innocent of charges of corruption relating to the arms deal."

Zuma had repeatedly asked for his day in court to clear his name and
until this happened, he could not be a fit candidate for the
Presidency of the country and he must withdraw until his name had been
cleared in court.

"Fourthly, it is clear that the NPA is susceptible to political
interference, which needs to change if we are to prevent accusations
of selective prosecution in the future," Zille said.

She said that the manner which these issues were dealt would determine
whether constitutional democracy was strengthened or weakened.

A number of measures could be taken to ensure transgressors were held
to account, that justice was served and that independent state
institutions were protected from undue political influence.

These interventions included the establishment of a judicial
commission of inquiry into the arms deal; the prosecution of Jacob
Zuma, after he had been given the opportunity to make representations,
given the prima facie case against him; and a re-evaluation of the
constitutional provisions and legislation governing the NPA, so as to
restore the integrity of that institution.


She added that should the National Prosecuting Authority decline to
prosecute ANC President Jacob Zuma on charges related to the arms
deal, the DA would investigate the option of bringing a private
prosecution against him.

"We need to be sure that a court has pronounced him innocent before he
assumes that office, and if a court finds him guilty, that he has no
chance of assuming that office.

"Because if somebody guilty of such serious corruption charges is in
the highest office in this country, then the rot will quickly
consolidate itself in the body politic, and it will be a disaster for
everybody," she said.

Read the detailed plan here >> http://www.da.org.za/?p=373


FLAWED INVESTIGATIONS FREE CRIMINALS

Failure by government to address weaknesses in the police's detective
service has allowed criminals to go unpunished, the Democratic
Alliance said last Thursday.

Briefing the media on the DA's recent survey on the capacity of the
SAPS's detective service, safety and security spokesperson Dianne
Kohler Barnard said the state had failed to equip the country's
investigators with adequate resources.

"As a result of the neglect of the Detective Services, the SAPS's
investigative ability has been severely undermined and this has
contributed to the overall dysfunction of our criminal justice
system," she said.

According to the DA's calculations, six out every 100 crimes reported
to the police resulted in a conviction.

Close to a million crime scenes were not being visited as a resulted
of a shortage of forensic experts in the SAPS.

Detectives managed a case load of 40 or more cases as opposed to the
norm of 10 cases.

Kohler Barnard attributed the deteriorating investigative capability
to the department of safety and security's pattern of funding that was
heavily skewed in favour of other components of the SAPS to the
detriment of the detective service.

"Since 2004, the Detective Service has received only a seven percent
increase in the number of staff while Protection Services, which does
not provide security to the general public but instead is used
increasingly to protect the ANC leadership, has increased by a
staggering 160 percent," she said.

Measures proposed by the DA to beef up the service included the
immediate employment of 30 000 detectives, the improvement of
detectives' salaries and high quality training.

"It is clear that, in order to improve the functioning of the criminal
justice system, the ability of the SAPS to detect and solve must be
substantially improved," Kohler Barnard said.

Read the full report here >> http://www.da.org.za/?p=431


COULD NEW DEAL BE THE BEGINNING OF STABILITY IN ZIM?

The news that ZANU-PF's Robert Mugabe and Movement for Democratic
Change leaders, Morgan Tsvangirai and Arthur Mutambara had finally
succeeded in reaching a mutually-agreeable power-sharing deal in
Zimbabwe, signed last Monday, was to be welcomed said DA foreign
affairs spokesperson, Tony Leon.

The significant reduction of Mugabe's powers was to be welcomed, he said.

While the signing of the deal was the first significant ray of hope
for the future stability of Zimbabwe, Leon voiced concerned about the
durability of the deal, as well as the dangerous precedent it would
set for the future of ballot-based regime change in Africa.

"The Kenyan power-sharing deal, which came in the wake of the
extensive political violence which followed that country's last
election, and today's agreement have established a disturbing trend in
Africa whereby despotic rulers can continue to cling to power even
after their removal from office by democratic means," he said.

"In addition to this, past experience has shown that Mugabe is not a
man who may be taken at his word; as such it remains to be seen
whether he will honour his part of the agreement."

"Of particular concern is the indication that the security ministries
– which have been used by ZANU-PF as instruments of political violence
– will by-and-large remain under Mugabe's control."

He expressed the hope that Zimbabwe's people who had been subject to
crippling socio-economic turmoil and political violence at the hands
of Mugabe's repressive regime would come to benefit from the
agreement, however flawed.

"We also hope that today's deal will be the last in a series of
political solutions in Africa, which ignore the democratic consensus
and threaten to undermine our chances of seeing true democracy take
root and flower on the continent," he concluded.


DID YOU KNOW?

While charities serving South Africa's neglected and abandoned
citizens have been fighting desperately with the National Lotteries
Board to have their applications processed, the NLB 2008 annual report
shows that its officials were all paid generous bonuses during the
2007/08 financial year.

• NLB staff received a total of R1.4m in bonus payments, amounting to
a 14% addition to the total salary bill, an amount that could have
been a life-line to some of the charities which have been brought to
the brink of closure by the NLB's failure to pay out..

• Six senior managers received approximately a quarter of this amount
(R279 000).

• The CEO benefited the most, with a large payout of R76 000.

• The manager of applications (who should be held directly responsible
for the chaos in the applications process) received a generous R49
000.

• Other staff members received an estimated average of R19 000.

THE NEGLECT OF OUR DETECTIVE SERVICES
http://www.eyeoncrime.co.za/?q=node/439

THE TRUTH BEHIND POLICING IN SOUTH AFRICA
http://www.eyeoncrime.co.za/?q=node/438

HOW GOOD IS YOUR PERSONAL SECURITY?
http://www.eyeoncrime.co.za/?q=node/437

WOULD YOU TACKLE CRIMINALS AFTER ONLY TWO WEEKS OF TRAINING?
http://www.eyeoncrime.co.za/?q=node/436

THIS WEEK IN THE REAL ANC TODAY

An overview of 11 key Judgments handed down by the High Court, the
Supreme Court of Appeal and the Constitutional Court, regarding the
ANC government and the nature of its administration.

The Nicholson Judgment has brought the ANC's behavior into stark
relief. Against that background, it is worth considering what the
Courts have had to say about the ruling party more generally.


http://realanctoday.wordpress.com/2008/09/19/the-judiciary-on-the-anc/

Friday, September 19, 2008

SA Today: Zuma must commit to the rule of law, not the rule of war

A weekly letter from the Leader of the Democratic Alliance 19 September 2008
Zuma must commit to the rule of law, not the rule of war


Since Judge Chris Nicholson ruled in his favour last Friday, Jacob
Zuma has suddenly become a staunch supporter of the courts' role in
promoting constitutional democracy.
On Monday, he told an audience that, "Our faith in the judiciary
has…been given a further boost by the ruling…", and that the "judgment
has re-emphasised the independence of the judiciary and the critical
role it plays in interpreting our Constitution…".
Most importantly, Zuma claimed, the verdict "opened the eyes of the
nation to the critical task at hand, to…protect our democratic
institutions and prevent their abuse to further political agendas".
It is all very well for Zuma to have made these remarks after the
Pietermaritzburg High Court's ruling, since the judgment went his way.
Beforehand, however, he showed little inclination to contradict or
restrain those of his supporters who had openly intimidated the
judiciary and threatened to unleash a wave of violence if he lost his
case. One of the unintended consequences of the verdict is that Zuma's
supporters may well believe their strategy worked.
Zuma's double-dealing reflects the "lie in the soul", to use Plato's
term, of the new ANC leadership cabal elected at Polokwane: its
misguided belief that the ANC is more important than the Constitution.
When constitutional institutions happen to come down on the side of
its leaders, the ANC is happy to talk the language of
constitutionalism and proclaim its commitment to the rule of law. When
it feels thwarted by those institutions, the ANC reverts to
revolutionary war-talk; it brands them "counter-revolutionary" enemies
of the people, and elevates the rule of war over the rule of law.
A week before judgment was passed by the High Court, some of Zuma's
backers protested outside courts in KwaZulu-Natal. They carried
banners stating: "We shall take arms if need be to support [the] ANC
President". Others burnt tyres outside police stations, and threw
stones at police officers.
Neither Zuma nor the party he leads unequivocally condemned these
actions. That is because the new crop of ANC leaders has only a
tenuous attachment to the rule of law.
We have seen it in what former ANC MP Kader Asmal calls the
"militarisation of our political discourse" – statements by senior ANC
officials calling on people to "prepare for war", "kill for Zuma" and
"fight to take over the streets".
ANC Youth League President Julius Malema specialises in this sort of
inflammatory rhetoric. Before the High Court passed judgment, he
pledged: "We'll never hand over our President to jail without a fight.
We're going to fight…Any force that tries to block our way, we will
eliminate. We are on a mission here. We will crush you".
ANC Secretary-General Gwede Mantashe also made warlike threats against
the judiciary before the High Court ruled. He labelled Constitutional
Court judges "counter-revolutionaries" and said that "when the…judges
pounce on our President we should be ready at that point in time
[because] our revolution is in danger [and] we must declare to defend
it till the end".
Malema and Mantashe's pronouncements, and countless others by senior
ANC leaders, formed part of a systematic campaign of intimidation
against the judiciary over the months that Zuma appeared in court.
The reasons for the campaign are not hard to find: If the judiciary
and the Constitution stand in the way of the personal interests of the
ANC President; if they contradict decisions taken by the party; and if
they frustrate the party's drive for absolute power, then the ANC is
ready to attack the judiciary and jettison the Constitution.
That is why Zuma's recent utterances about the judiciary and other
constitutional institutions need to be taken with a pinch of salt.
After all, this is the same man who argues that "the ANC is more
important than even the Constitution of the country".
However, if Zuma is serious about the rule of law, the constitutional
mandate of the courts, the independence of the judiciary, and the
political neutrality of other democratic institutions, he must match
his words with deeds.
Firstly, he must accept the decision by the NPA to appeal the High
Court's ruling, and instruct his party to do the same. ANC
spokesperson Jessie Duarte has called the NPA's move "cynical and
ill-considered". Cosatu's KwaZulu-Natal Secretary has described it as
"a declaration of war on our people".
It is hypocritical of the ANC and its alliance partners to praise
Judge Nicholson's ruling and then to lambaste the NPA's decision to
appeal it. The NPA is fully within its rights to appeal the verdict –
that is the due process of law – and Zuma has himself had recourse to
the appeals mechanism on several occasions during his trial.
Moreover, if there is a prima facie case against Zuma, the NPA is
legally bound to explore every legal avenue to ensure justice is done.
That is what the rule of law requires, and this is what the Nicholson
judgment also emphasised.
Secondly, as ANC President, Zuma must abandon his party's cadre
deployment policy. In deploying cadres to supposedly independent state
institutions, the ANC has subordinated these institutions to its own
political agenda. Once factionalism became rife within the ruling
party, it was inevitable that cadres would use the institutions they
led to fight battles on behalf of their political masters and
persecute their political opponents.
Indeed, this is what Zuma maintains about the NPA: that President
Mbeki got the former National Director of Public Prosecutions,
Bulelani Ngcuka (a deployed ANC MP) to do his bidding in making public
claims about a prima facie case of corruption against Zuma.
Cadre deployment has completely undermined the independence of our
constitutional institutions, whose very role it is to limit the ruling
party's power and guard against the abuse of that power. It is time
for the cadre deployment policy to be discarded once and for all, and
Zuma must set the ball in motion.
But he is unlikely to do so. Why would Zuma want an independent person
as the National Director of Public Prosecutions when he is facing
allegations of 783 counts of bribery over 10 years involving
R4,2-million? Zuma has done everything to avoid his day in court in
order to gain the power of the Presidency. If he does become
President, it is likely that he – more so than Thabo Mbeki – will
abuse the office to protect and enrich himself and his clique. Cadre
deployment is one of the key tools of abuse.
Zuma's commitment to constitutionalism, and the commitment of the
ruling party's post-Polokwane leadership, has yet to be truly tested.
The NPA is to appeal the High Court ruling, and it may reinstitute
charges against Zuma. If either of those moves is successful, our
constitutional democracy will face its greatest test yet. But our
judiciary is strong, and more people support the rule of law than the
rule of war. For that reason, I believe that the Constitution, rather
than empty war-talk, will win the day.

Best Wishes

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Elderly woman seriously assaulted with hammer

To: ireport@cnn.com, press.office@bbc.co.uk, yourpics@bbc.co.uk,
margaretha@publicy.nl, foxnewsonline@foxnews.com, news@sky.com,
news@newsday.com, stories@farmmurders.com, dtletters@telegraph.co.uk


An old woman (78) , Mrs. Marie Claassen from Kromdraai outside
Muldersdrift South-Africa , has been seriously assaulted with a hammer
by a black man wearing a beleclava and gloves.
Like this the reality of the NSA (New South Africa) creep upon us to
stalk us at our front porch.

Sunday evening 7 September 2008 at 21h00 on the farm Kromdraai :
A 78 year old woman are being assaulted in her Own home by a black man
that wear a beleclava and gloves . She has been hit with a hammer on
the head , one blow penetrated more than 3cm through the skull .
She still live and are being cared for in Hospital .
More detail in the attached interview on Radio Pretoria .

Interview wit Mr. Armand Claassen , Mrs. Marie's son on Radio Pretoria
VolksMikrofoon .

VolksMikrofoon : " Do she stay allone there ?"
Armand : " She
stay alone yes , my father died 14 years ago and my sister about 7
years ago. We tried to persuade her to move but she didn't want to
move due to the fact she stayed there over 40 years. Also we had good
security . "
VM : " What happened ? "
Armand : " It was Sunday evening at about 21h00 . She have a small dog
that stay with her in the house . The dog started to bark , usually
when he do this she know he want to go outside . When she opened the
door , a black man with a beleclava and gloves repeatedly assaulted
her with a hammer on the head . From there he dragged and threw her
through the house , blood on the walls and floor are evidence of that
, through the hallway into the main bedroom . He knew there is a safe
. "
VM : " Were she conscious ? "
Armand : " She say so yes , drifting in and out .In the room he hit
her another few blows with the hammer . He then got the keys for the
safe and emptied it . There is another safe but we don't have keys for
it , he then tried to break it open . After numerous unsuccesful
attempts , he hit her with the hammer on her fingers . Failing to open
the second safe , he decide to take the stolen items and load it into
her vehicle . The vehicle stopped outside the house due to the
anti-highjack system of the vehicle . He took what he could carry and
fled . "
VM : " What did he steal ? "
Armand : " Not much . Two fire-arms that were inside the safe . Mostly
jewelry and her bank cards . The next morning he withdrew a few
thousand rand , in the meantime we stopped the accounts . "
VM : " How did your mother got help , when did help arrive ? "
Armand : " The next morning . The farmworker phoned me at 08h30 to
tell me the gate are not being opened , he can't enter to start work .
I then went there immediately . When I arrived I found my mother in
the house , by then she was already more than 12 hours alone , in pain
and shock . "
VM : " What a shocking experience it must have been for you ? "
Armand : " She is small and old (78) , I cannot believe that one
person can do this to another person . It is pointless , he got what
he wanted ; it was not necesary for this absurd violence ."
VM : " I can't believe it , with a hammer over the head !! Are she
seriously injured ? "
Armand : " Yes she is seriously injured , she is in intensive care in
hospital . Three blows to the side of the skull cracked it , but
another blow on top of the head went right through and penetrated the
skull , causing a breakage in the skull bone 3cm in diameter . This
indicates he've hit her to kill her . "
VM : " What do the doctors say , what is her chances of survival ? "
Armand : " They say it is rather good . The one side of the body is
paralysed caused by the broken skullbone that causes pressure on the
brain . It will be removed in an operation. "
VM : " Is it only one person ? "
Armand : " Yes it was only one person . He dug a hole underneath the
electric fence , tracks indicate it is one person , also the stolen
items is enough for one person to carry . "
VM : " He obviously waited for her to open the door . "
Armand : " Yes , we looked outside and saw he tried to opened the
steel security gates . She didn't heard it because she was watching TV
, but the dog heard it and hence started barking . "
VM : " Is she going back to the farm ? "
Armand : " Not a chance , she'll stay with us . "

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

'Tell Nqakula I won't go'

16/09/2008 22:53 - (SA)

Virginia Keppler, Beeld

Pretoria - "Tell the minister of safety and security that I'm not
going to Australia, because South Africa is my home."

That's what a citrus farmer from Cullinan, east of Pretoria, said
after being shot three times in a robbery that took place at his house
on Monday night at 22:30.

John de Jager, 37, was shot three times in his right leg when he came
to the aid of his wife, Petronella, also 37, after armed robbers
attacked her at their washing line.

She had gone out to bring in the washing when she suddenly started
screaming. He immediately rushed outside, De Jager said from his bed
in Montana hospital on Tuesday.

Shot without warning

"I saw a man standing close to her. He didn't say anything and shot me
without warning. When the first bullet struck me, I rushed at him. He
then fired two more shots, hitting me in the same leg."

The robbers left him lying there and took his wife into the house.

"They took her to our bedroom to open the safe for them and then stole
two firearms and money from the safe."

The robbers also took the couple's cellphones and Petronella's wedding
rings and jewellery. They then tied her hands behind her back with her
husband's shoelaces.

"They also tied my hands and feet with my shoelaces and then sat on
me. When I told them I needed medical attention, they swore at me.

"Before they fled, they pulled a blanket over my head."

His wife managed to free herself and also cut him loose.

Son sleeps through drama

"I couldn't move and just lay there."

Fortunately their son, Günter, seven, slept through the drama.

More than a week ago De Jager caught two cable thieves on his property
and handed them over to the police. He believes the attack could be
related to that.

Minister of Safety and Security, Charles Nqakula, said in 2006 that
people who threaten to leave the country because of the high crime
rate should stop complaining or leave.

De Jager said he wasn't going to leave the country. "The minister
should rather be sacked.

"Tell him (the minister) I'm not a grumbler and I'll never leave the
country, because where shall I go? I just want them to bring back the
death penalty.

"My firearms are now out there and will be used in other armed robberies."

Source:News24

http://www.news24.com/News24/South_Africa/News/0,,2-7-1442_2394571,00.html

Monday, September 15, 2008

DA@WORK 15 September - quality healthcare should be accesible to all

MAKE QUALITY HEALTH CARE ACCESSIBLE TO ALL
The government must bridge the gap between the private and the public
health care sectors to create quality of care which all can access

COMPENSATION FUND IS FAILING THOUSANDS
According to the AG, the extent of the mismanagement of the CF ranged
from a complete breakdown of internal controls and a filing system in
complete disarray, to non-compliance with applicable legislation.

DEFENCE DEPARTMENT UNDER THE SPOTLIGHT
South Africa's defence sector should be subjected to rigorous scrutiny
in all respects, in light of its recent infringements of legislation.

ZAPIRO CARTOON SHOULD SHOCK THE RULING PARTY TO ITS SENSES
A metaphorical depiction that tells the truth and provokes argument
may be just what South Africa needs at this critical juncture.


QUOTE OF THE WEEK

The judgment also provides proof to Zuma's supporters, if any were
necessary, that the judiciary is impartial and will rule according to
the law. It is now incumbent upon them to demonstrate their respect
for the judiciary when judgments go against their political
preferences. If Zuma has his day in court, as we believe he must in
the interests of the country, his supporters will have no reason to
believe that he won't have a fair trial.

DA Leader Helen Zille comments on the Pietermartizburg High Court's
verdict set aside the decision to prosecute Jacob Zuma on fraud and
corruption charges on a technicality, saying nthat the rule of law
must be respected, in her weekly newsletter SA Today -
http://www.da.org.za/?p=357


MAKE QUALITY HEALTH CARE ACCESSIBLE TO ALL

The government must bridge the gap between the private and the public
health care sectors to create quality of care which all can access,
Democratic Alliance leader Helen Zille said last Tuesday.

"Our health care system works well for some. Most South Africans are
excluded from it. Most people still rely on the public health system,"
Zille told the party's New Vision for Health Care conference in
Johannesburg.

She criticised Cosatu secretary-general Zwelinzima Vavi's
recommendation to do away with the private health system.

"Nationalising health care would be disastrous, because it would shift
the burden of provision of quality health care to the state," she
said.

The state was incapable of providing quality health care for all, she said.

Zille also voiced her concern about the National Health Amendment Bill
- which would give Health Minister Manto Tshabalala-Msimang the power
to determine private sector hospital fees.

"This would lead to a further loss of skills. Private health providers
would close their doors... shrinking the private sector and placing an
even greater burden on an already incapacitated public health care
sector," she said.

She recommended that the government only be involved in the financing
of health care and not in service delivery, adding that this would
allow market forces to ensure efficiency and keep down costs.

Examples of this were the Canadian, Singaporean and Taiwanese health
care systems, said Zille.

"We need to find a working solution that would allow private providers
to earn a living while the state meets its obligation to its people."

She said reforming the health care system would mean fixing what was
not working without destroying what did work.

Read the full speech here >> http://www.da.org.za/?p=213


COMPENSATION FUND IS FAILING THOUSANDS

The Democratic Alliance last Monday called for a forensic
investigation of the Compensation Fund (CF) and for the fund to be put
out to tender.

The latest disclaimer by the Auditor-General in his report on the CF
tabled in parliament, confirmed the evidence of complaints to the DA
that the fund was in serious disarray, DA labour spokesperson Anchen
Dreyer said.

According to the AG, the extent of the mismanagement of the CF ranged
from a complete breakdown of internal controls and a filing system in
complete disarray, to non-compliance with applicable legislation.

The CF was supposed to assist employees who had had the misfortune of
contracting an occupational disease or suffering an injury while on
duty.

The neglect and mismanagement of this fund caused direct harm to
ordinary South African workers, especially those who could not afford
private sector disability insurance and were therefore most
vulnerable.

Dreyer said complaints received by the DA indicated it was not only
individual claimants who were disgruntled with the CF and service
providers had also not been spared.

Some medical practitioners had resorted to demanding cash upfront from
employers of injured staff, while others were flatly refusing to treat
CF patients to avoid the risk of late payment or no payment at all.

Common among the complainants was a poor track record of payment. One
legal consultant highlighted an unresolved case dating back as far as
1994.

Generally, those lucky enough to receive payment had to wait for at
least a year to get their first instalment.

Particularly worrisome was the lack of political will the labour
minister had displayed in this regard, and the absence of purposeful
action to resolve the fund's long-standing problems.

In 2005, the CF strategy 2006-2009 was introduced to improve customer
satisfaction through service and efficiency.

"Two and a half years down the line little has changed," Dreyer said.

"The time has come for the department to undertake a forensic
investigation of the Compensation Fund.

"The Commissioner and his top staff must be held accountable for
letting down vulnerable workers in this way.

"The DA further contends that the Compensation Fund should be put out
to tender. Let the best bidder run it in a professional manner, to the
benefit of injured and sick South African workers," she said.


DEFENCE DEPARTMENT UNDER THE SPOTLIGHT

South Africa's defence sector should be subjected to rigorous scrutiny
in all respects, in light of its recent infringements of legislation
said the Democratic Alliance last Wednesday.

"Given the recent debacle in April 2008 in which the NCACC, in
contravention of the rules that bind it, permitted a Chinese weapons
shipment bound for Zimbabwe to be conveyed across South Africa, it is
Vital that all its transactions are shown to be transparent and open,"
said DA defence spokesperson, Rafeek Shah.

It appeared that there were serious unresolved issues regarding
defence industry interests held by senior defence force members, which
served to undermine civilian oversight of the defence force.

The Auditor-General (A-G) had previously found that the current Acting
Secretary for Defence, Mr Tsepe Motumi, was named as a director in
Chancellor House Defence Dynamics, which is part of the Chancellor
House Group, the front company for the ANC.

"Given Mr Motumi's high ranking position in the Department of Defence,
such alleged vested interests in the defence sector are highly
inappropriate."

"If the allegations are true, it means that specific business
interests are in a position to benefit from inside information, and if
these business interests are associated with political parties – and
the ruling party in particular - it has serious implications for good
governance in our country," said Shah.

As early as August 2007, the AG had stated in his report that the
potential for a conflict of interests existed within the department
and had called for action to address this on the part of the NCACC.

"The Democratic Alliance calls upon the Minister of Defence to confirm
whether or not these allegations are true and, if so, how such a
situation could have been allowed to occur," Shah said.

He said that the DA had submitted parliamentary questions to gain
clarity on the situation and would pursue it within the Defence
Portfolio Committee to ensure that all members of the DoD declared
their interests openly and completely.

"Clear measures must be taken to ensure that state information is not
used to further personal and political interests," he stated.

ZAPIRO CARTOON SHOULD SHOCK THE RULING PARTY TO ITS SENSES

Reacting to the controversy that sprang up over a cartoon by Jonathan
Shapiro (Zapiro), depicting the "rape of justice" by ANC president
Jacob Zuma, the Democratic Alliance said that neither Shapiro nor the
Sunday Times was practising abuse of the freedom of expression in
creating or publishing the cartoon.

"A metaphorical depiction that tells the truth and provokes argument
may be just what South Africa needs at this critical juncture. It may
also be what is needed to shock the country's leaders into their
senses," said party communications spokesperson, Dene Smuts.

"The Constitutional Court has confirmed in different judgments that
free speech includes ideas that shock or disturb, and that the
arbitration of taste cannot form part of adjudication."

"The truly shocking fact is that the ANC's new rulers – effectively
the SACP, ANC Youth League and Cosatu – have been attacking the
constitutional order at its foundation for many months now - by
calling the chief justices counter-revolutionary (Mr Gwede Mantashe);
issuing a threat that a ruling against Jacob Zuma would 'take the
country to the brink' (Blade Nzimande); and mounting demonstrations
against the courts," she said.

DID YOU KNOW?

The South African Social Security Agency's (SASSA) annual report
released last week, revealed a startling vacancy rate at the agency,
meaning that its capacity to deliver comprehensive social security
services to South Africa's poorest and most vulnerable citizens could
be seriously compromised.

The report shows that SASSA has an overall vacancy rate of 58.7% with
vacancies highly concentrated in critical areas, for instance:

• Out of 10 475 posts of permanent skilled workers only 4 323
vacancies were filled. This is a 58.7 percent vacancy rate.
• The vacancy rate of permanent highly skilled employees stands at
64.5 percent (out of 5341 posts only 1896 were filled).
• The vacancy rate at senior management and supervisory (highly
skilled) level is 32.6 and 57.7 percent respectively.
• To compound this situation, the finance department tasked with
detecting social grant fraud also has an alarming vacancy rate of 49.2
percent - out of 366 vacancies only 186 are filled and the legal
department which must initiate legal proceedings against fraudsters is
51.4 percent vacant.

With the high level of social grant fraud and the agency's incapacity
to deal with this, it comes as no surprise that SASSA has overspent by
R 33 659 000.

CAMERAS GO UP IN BID TO WEED OUT BAD COPS
http://www.eyeoncrime.co.za/?q=node/432

KNOW YOUR ENEMY
http://www.eyeoncrime.co.za/?q=node/431

ROBBERS TARGETING OUR HOMES – AND COMING IN ARMED
http://www.eyeoncrime.co.za/?q=node/430

DO WE FIGHT BACK? APPARENTLY NOT!
http://www.eyeoncrime.co.za/?q=node/429

Heart expert's wife murdered

15/09/2008 09:44 - (SA)

Jackie Pienaar-Brink, Die Burger

Cape Town - The wife of a member of the team that carried out the
world's first heart transplant was murdered in the early hours of
Sunday morning in Hermanus.

The body of Lulu Hewitson, 84, was found in the foyer of her house at
about 04:00. She had a stab wound to her back.

Her husband, Professor Rodney Hewitson, survived the attack as he was
in another part of the house, said police spokesperson Superintendent
André Traut. He was badly traumatised.

The elderly woman was murdered after she presumably pressed the panic button.

The suspects are believed to have gained entrance to the house through
a living room window, which they took out. They fled the same way.

'Awful and ironic'

The murdered woman's husband was Professor Chris Barnard's right-hand
man during the first heart transplant at Groote Schuur Hospital in
1967.

"That he lost his wife in this way is awful and ironic," said
Professor Johan Brink of the Chris Barnard Memorial Hospital's
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery.

"As a doctor, he had dedicated himself to the less fortunate. Over the
years he helped hundreds of people who had been stabbed in the chest.
He was an extremely committed doctor and a mentor for heart surgery
all over the world."

One of the couple's sons, Dr John Hewitson, followed in his father's
footsteps as a heart surgeon while another, Professor Bruce Hewitson
of the University of Cape Town, is an internationally recognised
climate expert. A third son is a pilot in Mozambique.

According to Traut, the motive was presumably housebreaking with the
intention to steal possessions, though nothing valuable was missing.

No one has been arrested and the murder weapon is still missing.

Source:News24

http://www.news24.com/News24/South_Africa/News/0,,2-7-1442_2393506,00.html

Sunday, September 14, 2008

Mooirivier RATES DISPUTE - PLEASE DISTRIBUTE AS WIDELY AS POSSIBLE

From: Mpofana Ratepayers & Residents Association
[mailto:ratescom@lantic.net]
Sent: 12 September 2008 05:30

RATES DISPUTE
It has come to our attention that the municipality has sent out letters
to residents who have declared a dispute wherein they state, inter alia,
the following:-

1. The dispute claimed is illegal and invalid, and,
2. Warns that the Municipality has elected to sue the
residents of the Mpofana Municipality, who have elected to raise the
said disputes, due to their failure to pay their rates.
We view this action as illegal on the part of the municipality and have
already consulted with our attorneys and believe that the letter is
aimed at intimidating those residents who have declared a dispute. We
urge all residents not to be intimidated by the illegal actions of a
desperate municipality. It is clear that the dispute action by the MRRA
and The Mooi River Farmers Association has made the municipality
desperate and they are therefore resorting to illegal and intimadatory
tactics.
We have drawn their attention to the provisions of the various pieces of
Municipal legislation that encourage and oblige the Municipality to
engage the public and promote public participation. By ignoring the
residents needs and concerns the Municipality continues to cause further
hardship in the community.
Each individual letter of dispute has been handed to the Municipality;
accordingly the Municipality is now under a statutory obligation and
duty to resolve every one of these disputes with each ratepayer
concerned. The Municipality is obliged to investigate every dispute and
then communicate its findings to the residents concerned. However as an
association, we have been appointed to act for and on behalf of the
residents and as a result, the Municipality is ordered to communicate
directly with us and we will respond for and on behalf of the residents.
Until every dispute has been resolved, the Municipality is precluded
from handing over any of its residents in terms of the act.
We have drawn the Municipality's attention to the said provisions of the
act and should the municipality not adhere to the provisions of the act
and unlawfully proceed to handover the ratepayers, who have elected to
exercise their Constitutional rights as contained in our Constitution,
this will be brought to the attention of the Magistrate concerned and an
appropriate order as to costs will be sought against the Municipality.
We also highlighted the fact the rates accounts issued by the
municipality do not comply with Section 27 of the Municipal Property
Rates Act (Act 6 of 2004) and are therefore invalid/illegal.
We further pointed out that the letter of demand is defective as it does
not comply with the provisions of the Municipality's Credit Policy and
fails to comply with the National Credit Act, 2005.
As an association we will continue with our dispute until a satisfactory
solution is reached. We once again urge all residents to support the
action of their respective associations i.e. the MRRA and the Mooi River
Farmers Association and not to be intimated by the municipalities
illegal and desperate actions.
For any further information please do not hesitate to contact me or any
of the following members. Trevor Diener (082 824 4505); Johan Albertyn
(082 450 4282); John Zelenka (082 864 0955) or Sayed Kazi (082 497
8604)

Your sincerely

Hayden Soobramoney
Chairman
Mpofana Ratepayers & Residents Association
Phone : 083 485 1583
Fax : 086 550 1379
Email : ratescom@lantic.net

_____

Executive Committee: H.Soobramoney (Chairman); T. Diener
(Vice-Chairman); J.Albertyn; N.Coetsee; N.Ahmed; C.Cornelius; J.Zelenka;
S. Winckworth;
R. Mackenzie; N. Kerr; SMI Kazi; K Denysschen; F. Swindon; V. Zaca

Saturday, September 13, 2008

Boksburg Calamari platter -

For a real seafood experience, stop at Koos's Restaurant in Rachel de
Beer street, Boksburg. Their calamari platter is, hmm, unique and the
price is just right. And what's more, you get a glass of Pick 'n Pay
Late Harvest on the house!

Cheers

Chris

Helen Zille: SA Today - The Zuma Verdict: What now?

A weekly letter from the Leader of the Democratic Alliance 12 September 2008
The Zuma verdict: What now?

As a party that upholds the rule of law and the Constitution, the DA
respects the Pietermartizburg High Court's verdict, based on a legal
technicality, to set aside the decision to prosecute Jacob Zuma on
fraud and corruption charges. The Court ruled on the basis that the
National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) did not allow Zuma to make
representations before it decided to reinstate the charges against him
– as it was required to do by the Constitution.
An unintended consequence of the judgment is that some of Jacob Zuma's
supporters may conclude that their intimidatory and violent behaviour
influenced the judge's decision. They must understand that their
behaviour had no influence at all on the judgment. They must also
understand that the verdict does not absolve Zuma of guilt.
It is significant that Judge Nicholson stressed that this verdict was
not a judgment on Zuma's guilt or innocence. This means that we are
still no closer to knowing whether Zuma is innocent or guilty of the
corruption charges brought against him. The DA will not rest until
this is resolved.
This is why the DA reiterates its call for a full judicial commission
of inquiry into the arms deal, headed by a retired judge nominated by
the Chief Justice. The truth must out and justice must be served. No
person implicated in arms deal corruption deserves to escape the due
process of law.
We have also called for Parliament to be dissolved and for a fresh
election to be held – in light of Judge Nicholson's statement that he
was "not convinced that the applicant [Zuma] was incorrect in averring
political meddling in his prosecution". There are further statements
in the judgment that can only lead to the inference that, under
President Thabo Mbeki's tenure, instruments of state were abused for
political purposes in the ANC's factional struggles for control.
This means that Mbeki, and power brokers aligned to him, have
undermined the Constitution. It is untenable that he remain President
under such circumstances.
But the dissolution of Parliament could result in an equally untenable
situation, because it would merely clear the way for Zuma to become
the President with a heavy cloud still hanging over his head. Voters
cannot exercise an informed choice under these circumstances.
The factional battles in the ANC, and the ruling party's abuse of the
Constitution, have put South Africa between a rock and a hard place.
That is why two things must happen in the interests of the country:
Mbeki must step down as President, and Zuma must withdraw as a
candidate for the Presidency until he has had his day in court, and
his guilt or innocence has been established. Until these men put the
country before their own interests, South Africa will continue to be
dragged down by the unresolved consequences of the arms deal scandal.
The upside of the judgment is that it nullifies the demand by Zuma's
supporters for a political rather than a legal solution. A political
deal would have had profound consequences for the future of our
constitutional democracy because it would have placed an accused above
the law, on the basis of his political status. The question of a
political solution cannot be revived, even if the NPA decides to
appeal the High Court judgment.
The judgment also provides proof to Zuma's supporters, if any were
necessary, that the judiciary is impartial and will rule according to
the law. It is now incumbent upon them to demonstrate their respect
for the judiciary when judgments go against their political
preferences. If Zuma has his day in court, as we believe he must in
the interests of the country, his supporters will have no reason to
believe that he won't have a fair trial.
Our judiciary has shown that it will not be complicit in power abuse.
The Constitutional Court's action against Judge Hlophe shows this, as
does the ruling two weeks ago that the Erasmus Commission of Inquiry
was unlawful and unconstitutional.
I have already unpacked the importance of that judgment for
constitutional democracy, and will not repeat myself here, suffice it
to say that the verdict filled me with renewed hope for the future of
our country. It showed that the Constitution can successfully be
defended against the ANC's abuse of power, and that the courts have
the muscle to check such abuses.
That sets an important precedent for the future, and it also shows
that, institutionally, the judiciary will not be swayed by powerful
politicians. Institutions are the bedrock of constitutional democracy;
without them, the entire edifice crumbles.
As we move forward, all South Africans – Zuma's supporters included –
should take heart that we have a robust and impartial judiciary. This
gives us hope for the future.

Best Wishes

Thursday, September 11, 2008

Blog Review -Rasmussen College


Featured Website : http://www.rasmussen.edu

About Rasmussen
Our mission-
Rasmussen College is dedicated to serving our communities by recognizing the diverse needs of individuals.
We encourage personal and proffesional development through Respect , Appreciation and Commitment to general education as a foundation for life long learning.
As an Institution of Higher Learning , Rasmussen College is committed to preparing students to be active , productive and succesful contributors to a global community.

Program offerings
Associate Degrees , Bachelor Degrees , Master Degrees , Certificates and Diplomas.
School of Allied Health
School of Business
School of Justice Studies
School of Education
School of Nursing
School of Technology and Design

Also offered completely or partly online.



We're Hiring - Rasmussen Careers
Rasmussen is an unique company that flourishes with an entreprenarial spirit , while still offering the security and benefits of an established corporate organization . With a strong tradition of promoting from within , the potential for proffesional growth abounds at Rasmussen as evidenced by our abundant new campus openings and new school partnerships.

** Choose a rewarding career with us **
We are currently seeking to add to our team of dedicated proffesionals.
If you are a passionate and motivated individual who desires to work in a proffesional , team-oriented corporate culture , view our current openings today.
Positions are available at our campuses in Minnesota , Wisconsin , Illinois , Florida and North Dakota , as well as at our central offices in Chicago , Orlando and the Twin Cities.



Accreditations & Aprovals
"Accreditation is meant to protect students , schools and employers. It ensures that a school is teaching its students at a national acceptable level . When a student receives a diploma from a school accredited by the right agency , he can be assured that it will be accepted by all employers."


For more info visit : http://www.rasmussen.edu

Monday, September 8, 2008

DA@WORK 8 September - DA vindicated in Erasmus commission ruling

DA@WORK 8 September

DA VINDICATED BY COURT FINDING ON ERASMUS COMMISSION
Rasool's establishment of the commission was not only an abuse of the
law, but also of millions of rands in taxpayer's money - money which
would have been far better spent on delivering much-needed services to
the people of the Western Cape, he concluded.

FAILING SCHOOL NUTRITION PROGRAMME LEAVES IMPOVERISHED CHILDREN STARVING
Amongst the problems are non-delivery of food, shortages and delivery
of poor-quality products.

DA CALLS FOR URGENT DEBATE ON THE ONSLAUGHT OF CRIME IN SA
The time has now come for Parliament, which represents the people of
South Africa, to debate this matter vigorously, and to compel the
government to seek immediate solutions to the country's crime
epidemic.

DA WELCOMES END TO POLITICAL INTERFERENCE IN MEDICINES REGULATION
decision on the Medicines Amendment Bill by Parliament's health
portfolio committee, which will see medicines registered only on the
basis of safety, quality and efficacy, was welcomed by the Democratic
Alliance last Wednesday.


QUOTE OF THE WEEK

"It seems like SASCOC (South African Sports Confederation and Olympic
Committee) officials are more preoccupied with flying business class,
staying at five-star hotels, and enjoying the best food than they are
with the interests of our athletes."

DA sports spokesperson Donald Lee comments on allegations that South
African athletes competing at the paralympic games in Beijing had not
yet received their training equipment and had to walk at least 2kms -
including those on crutches - to buy refreshments, as SASCOC had
failed to distribute the magnetic coupons which allowed them to
purchase items from vending machines.


DA VINDICATED BY COURT FINDING ON ERASMUS COMMISSION

Democratic Alliance leader Helen Zille, vindicated by the High Court's
finding on the unlawfulness of the Erasmus Commission, has called for
the dismissal of former premier Ebrahim Rasool, now working as a
ministerial adviser, and provincial Police Commissioner Mzwandile
Petros.

She is also calling for the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) to
investigate whether there had been misconduct by Judge Nathan Erasmus,
who chaired the commission.

"As a public servant, Rasool is required by the Constitution to
promote and maintain a high standard of professional ethics," Zille
said.

"In the light of the Cape High Court judgment, however, it is clear he
is unfit for this form of public office."

Rasool has been appointed special adviser to Minister in the
Presidency Kgalema Motlanthe.

Zille said DA chief whip Ian Davidson would write to Motlanthe, asking
him to dismiss Rasool. She also called for the dismissal of Petros,
found by the court to have illegally handed police evidence to Rasool.

"According to the court ruling, that information should have been
fully investigated by the police and then handed to the Director of
Public Prosecutions, and not to a politician for his own purposes."

The DA's provincial representatives have called on Petros to resign.

Zille said she had asked the DA's representative on the JSC, Sheila
Camerer, to approach the commission with a view to investigating
whether Erasmus had been guilty of misconduct.

Erasmus had compromised himself, and the integrity of the judicial
system, when he agreed to chair the commission, Zille said. The court
also found he had acted unlawfully by providing an interim report,
containing confidential information, to Rasool.

"For these two reasons, I believe Judge Erasmus may have a case to
answer to the JSC," Zille said.

She said the JSC gave vague terms of reference for what constituted misconduct.

"Here we have the Cape High Court saying very specifically that a
judge should not have accepted that appointment, and should definitely
not have given the outcome of the investigation to a politician,
saying that it was illegal."

Zille said her position that a judge should not chair an
illegally-constituted commission had been 100 percent underscored by
the high court.

Zille said she had known from the beginning that there could only have
been a political motive for the commission.

The DA's legal advisers are to investigate whether Rasool or any other
official involved in the Erasmus Commission may be personally liable
for costs incurred.

Zille has written asking the Public Protector to investigate whether
the commission was an abuse of funds.

"The (court) decision declaring the Erasmus Commission unlawful and
invalid was a landmark ruling for constitutional democracy. As such,
it will have repercussions far beyond the City of Cape Town - by
reaffirming the supremacy of the Constitution."

Speaking after judgement was handed down by the court last Monday,
Chairperson of the DA's Federal Council, James Selfe said that the
court's decision was a full vindication of the DA's long held view
that the commission was established by Rasool out of political malice,
and with the overriding objective of smearing the DA.

"It is now clear for all to see that both Rasool and the ANC's zeal in
establishing the commission and misusing the judiciary was a desperate
attempt by the governing party to strengthen its dwindling prospects
ahead of next year's election," he said.

Rasool's establishment of the commission was not only an abuse of the
law, but also of millions of rands in taxpayer's money - money which
would have been far better spent on delivering much-needed services to
the people of the Western Cape, he concluded.


FAILING SCHOOL NUTRITION PROGRAMME LEAVES IMPOVERISHED CHILDREN STARVING

A Public Service Commission (PSC) report into the functioning of the
National School Nutrition Programme in two provinces has shown that
many impoverished children are going hungry due to unreliable food
suppliers, the Democratic Alliance revealed last Thursday.

"Suppliers often do not deliver at all, or do not deliver what they
are contracted to supply," said party education spokesperson, George
Boinamo.

He said the DA would be asking questions to the Minister of Education
to ascertain what steps were being taken to improve levels of
accountability of those contracted to provide school meals.

The study, conducted in the Eastern Cape and Limpopo, showed that the
Nutrition Programme was a significant benefit to the children who
received it and had improved their attendance, concentration and
academic ability.

"It has proven itself as an essential tool in helping poor children to
lift themselves out of poverty and thus problems that still prevent
some children from being able to benefit from the programme must be
resolved," Boinamo said.

The report stated that amongst the problems were "non-delivery of
food, shortages and delivery of poor-quality products"

"In 20% of Eastern Cape schools, food was not provided five days a
week, as required, but sometimes on only two or three days, and
deliveries were also often late."

"While deliveries were more reliable in Limpopo, a quarter of
principals said that the food they received was not fresh, 32% of
principals said there were problems with delayed delivery and 20% said
too little food was delivered," he said.

"It appears that suppliers are often more interested in profits than
in supporting children."

Boinamo added that, in some cases, the schools were partly to blame in
that many did not monitor feeding programmes through nutrition
committees and that only about 20% of principals actually monitored
the delivery of food and evaluated the performance of suppliers as was
the requirement.

"As most of the children in the schools surveyed come to school
without breakfast, it is imperative that the importance of the
nutrition programme is acknowledged and improved in order to ensure
that all children living in poverty can benefit properly from it,"
Boinamo said.

DA CALLS FOR URGENT DEBATE ON THE ONSLAUGHT OF CRIME IN SA

Reacting to the brutal slaughter of the Sham family over the weekend,
DA safety and security spokesperson, Dianne Kohler Barnard said she
would move a motion in the National Assembly, when parliament
reconvened in mid September, calling for an urgent debate on the rapid
onslaught of crime in South Africa, and what immediate steps may be
taken to stem it.

"Naren and Meera Sham, and their 20-year-old son, Kavir, were gagged,
had their hands tied behind their backs, and their throats slit by a
band of armed men who had forced themselves into the family's Stamford
Hill home."

"The fact that Kavir was best friends with my own son, Peter Barnard,
makes this tragedy all the more personal to me," she said, "but what
is even more tragic is the fact that my family and the Shams' many
grieving friends and relatives represent only the smallest drop in the
ocean of South Africans who have lost their loved ones to the scourge
of violent crime."

She called on parliament to debate the issue urgently in light of
mounting indications that the ANC government was simply not up to the
task of tackling South Africa's debilitating crime epidemic.

Earlier in the year, Justice & Constitutional Development
Deputy-Minister, Johnny de Lange admitted: "The situation is sometimes
so overwhelming that we don't know what to do about crime. We have not
necessarily taken the right decisions over the past 15 years or used
resources efficiently."

In addition, the most recent crime statistics released by the SAPS
showed a 14.5% spike in the number of residential robberies throughout
the country , as well as a 4.4% increase in the frequency of car
hijackings, and a staggering 47.4% increase in the regularity of
business robberies.

"In August, the DA released a comprehensive crime plan, aimed at
addressing the problems within our criminal justice system, which
includes putting more police officers on the streets and training more
detectives in order to beef up the SAPS' investigative capacity."

"We called for the reinstatement of SAPS' specialised units, and put
forward proposals for the improvement of South Africa's prisons by,
amongst others, involving prisoners in productive labour and community
upliftment," she said.

"The time has now come for Parliament, which represents the people of
South Africa, to debate this matter vigorously, and to compel the
government to seek immediate solutions to the country's crime
epidemic."


DA WELCOMES END TO POLITICAL INTERFERENCE IN MEDICINES REGULATION

A decision on the Medicines Amendment Bill by Parliament's health
portfolio committee, which will see medicines registered only on the
basis of safety, quality and efficacy, was welcomed by the Democratic
Alliance last Wednesday.

DA health spokesperson Mike Waters lauded the committee's decision to
'reject ministerial interference' in medicines regulation.

"We hope that this decision will finally put an end to a proposal
from the health ministry that would have delayed or denied access to
life-saving drugs to South Africans by politicising the approvals
process," Waters said.

Over the past few weeks, the committee had been discussing a proposal
in the bill for a two-tier system for the regulation of medicines,
with the second tier involving approval by the minister on political
grounds.

"However, in debate on the clause today, ANC members were slowly
convinced of the danger of the minister's proposal and eventually
agreed to reject it," he said.

"The clause has now been removed from the Bill which is being voted on
today and which will be presented to parliament later this year for
voting."


DID YOU KNOW?

Contrary to Minister of Safety and Security Charles Nqakula's
assertions that the amalgamation of the Scorpions with the SAPS would
run smoothly a reply to a DA parliamentary question has revealed that:

• Only 121 members of the South African Police Service (SAPS) had
completed the new five week organised crime course which began more
than one year ago.

• Furthermore, according to the SAPS's own figures, only 17% of staff
belonging to organised crime, serious economic offences and commercial
branch units had tertiary qualifications.

• Of the total 24,343 members, each member had completed an average of
only five SAPS courses - which included any course offered by the
SAPS, and not necessarily related to investigative expertise.

It is critical that all units that investigate organised crime have
the required training and expertise. The DSO's successful record is a
direct result of having highly-skilled and -qualified staff working on
complex cases.

EYE ON CRIME

NOT IN THE SAME LEAGUE
http://www.eyeoncrime.co.za/?q=node/428

DO YOU FEEL SAFE AT HOME?
http://www.eyeoncrime.co.za/?q=node/427

BRIBES AND THREATS
http://www.eyeoncrime.co.za/?q=node/426

"MAXUIMUM SECURITY PRISON" – NOT SO SECURE AFTER ALL
http://www.eyeoncrime.co.za/?q=node/425


THE REAL ANC TODAY

In this week's edition we provide 'The Idiot's Guide to the Erasmus
Commission' http://realanctoday.wordpress.com/2008/09/05/an-idiots-guide-to-the-erasmus-commission/
– a simple overview of the 157 page judgment handed down last week by
the Cape High Court, and what it means for the ANC and our democracy.
Click through http://realanctoday.wordpress.com/ , read it, tell us
what you think. You can also, subscribe to the RSS feed, or to
subscribe by e-mail.

Heritage Day 24 September 2008 - South Africa

To: press.office@bbc.co.uk, yourpics@bbc.co.uk, margaretha@publicy.nl,
foxnewsonline@foxnews.com, news@sky.com, ireport@cnn.com,
InsideAfrica@cnn.com, news@newsday.com, dtletters@telegraph.co.uk
Cc: afriforum@solidariteit.co.za, ernst@afriforum.co.za,
atkv@atkv.org.za, hoofkantoor@abond.co.za,
hoofkantoor@voortrekkers.org.za, info@da.org.za, admin@kzn.da.org.za,
sec@kzn.da.org.za, info@vf.co.za, info@hnp.org.za,
nmtyelwa@anc.org.za, ntshabalala@anc.org.za

From: Jacob Mouw <iid@vodamail.co.za>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 05:15:20 +0100
Subject: Open Letter to Premier Ndebele about Dingane and God's General

8 September 2008

Dear ANC-Premier of KwaZulu: Mr Joel Ndebele,

In your reference to the legacy of King Dingane on 4 September 2008,
you state: "King Dingane has been misrepresented by some white
historians as a murderer, ..."

But on the 14th of August 2004, the black Zulu King unveiled in your
and Jacob Zuma's presence, a monument in honour of a great general
and prime minister to the Zulu Nation - Ndlela kaSompisi, as depicted
at http://eshowe.com/article/articlestatic/53/1/18/, where it says:

"It is not an exaggeration to say that the unstinting bravery of
Ndlela ensured the perpetuity of the Zulu Royal family."

"Ndlela with characteristic astuteness and deftness, survived
Dingane's purging..."

"Ndlela performed a high wire and dangerous act, which was ultimately
to result in his violent death. Dingane to prevent contenders to the
throne, had many of his fathers children murdered."

"Ndlela persuaded Dingane not to murder his brother Mpande, arguing
that it would diminish his greatness and that, in any case, Mpande did
not aspire to the throne. The Battle of Maqongqe where the forces of
Mpande and Dingane clashed in 1840, culminated in Dingane calling
Ndlela a traitor."

"Ndlela's death was a cruel death that our hero had to endure, when
(Dingane), who he had served so well, ordered his death through slow
strangling with a cow hide throng."

"It would be no exaggeration to say Ndlela paid with his life for the
preservation of the Zulu Royal Line that we have today."

Honourable premier, are the amaKhosi today to believe that white
historians misrepresented Dingane as a murderer, and that the mortal
enemy of the Royal Zulu Line: Dingane - the death torturer of the hero
Ndlela kaSompisi - was not a murderer?

Premier, you have spoken in public how God himself blessed Africa with
Renaissance, via King Mpande's Christianity. This is the same prince
Mpande whom Dingane sought to kill, due to his Christian co-operation
with the Voortrekker Andries Pretorius - after whom Pretoria was named
as the capital of the Christian Civilization of the Transvaal.

Instead of a barbaric murderer, let us together honour our common
heroes, like Mpande's protector General Ndlela, who also protected the
Voortrekkers at Dingane's bloodthirsty battle of Bloodrivier, where
Ndlela in his destined role of God's General, single handedly thwarted
Dingane's plan to exterminate the ancestral fathers, mothers and
children of the Afrikaners on that sunny Sunday of 16 December 1838.

By siding with Mpande and Pretorius on that historic Holy Day, that
giant strategy genius en intelligent chief Induna, God's General
Ndlela, decapacitated Dingane's almighty military powerbase, whilst he
simultaneously saw to it that not a single Voortrekker was harmed in
his and Pretorius' perfectly planned "attack" tactics.

By waiting till daylight, by containing Dinganes' impis until all
traces of morning moisture and mist had cleared, by ordering the
frontline troops to take a relaxed posture close to the opposing
defensive position, and by synchronising repeated storm attacks with
the arduous reloading cycle of pre-modern muskets, the genial General
Ndlela won the day in his political power struggle against Dingane.

Due to Ndlela's brilliant brain, Dingane's symbol of centralised
political power, UMgungundlovu went up in a whiff of smoke, and soon
there-after, so Dingane's racist supremacism over the legitimate royal
Mpande and white aristocratic Voortrekkermen as well.

With Pretorius' and Mpande's further final co-operation, Dingane's
murderous manipulations and dreams of dictatorial domination
disappeared, and so the last humanitarian disasters emanating from the
great Difaqane came to an ignominious end.

The Great God of Bloodriver, is not only God of the Voortrekkers, but
through the victorious King Mpande and his political alliance with
Andries Pretoria and General Ndlela, for ever also the God of the
Zulus and their Royal Line till today, till tomorrow, into all
eternity.

Dingane the murderer is dead. Long live the Zulu Nation thanks to the
Royal Line of Mpande and his friend Andries Pretorius, and their
mutual friend: God's General Ndlela.

We thereby invite you, as well as the honourable president of the ANC
and future president of South-Africa, Zulu Zuma, together with the
Royal descendants of his majesty King Mpande, to honour Ndlela
kaSompisi as God's General on 16 December 2008, when God reveals
himself visibly via the African Atendisc on the sarcophagus in
Pretoria with the wondrous words and heavenly vow: ONS - GOD - VIR JOU
SUID-AFRIKA.

It is our intention to ask the management of the Voortrekker Temple in
Pretoria - which, as religious symbol of the real African Renaissance,
and as South-Africa's world renowned international tourist attraction,
and as the Eighth Wonder of the modern world, for permission to
position at the centre in its holy Hall of Heroes, under the African
Aten, a miniature replica of the Ndlela-Monument, in order to
commemorate our common heritage and honour God and his General in
history.

For God has created holy history with human hands, and by the
brilliant brain of the biggest hero of them all: Ndlela kaSompisi, who
was murdered and mutilated by a demonic Dingane, as were Piet Retief
and seventy unarmed Afrikaner sons of God.

Premier Ndebele, we trust that you will inform Mr Zuma and the
amaKhosi of KwaZulu of our intention to honour Zulu Ndela as our
national hero and God's General on 16 December in Pretoria, and are
awaiting your favourable response as a sign of your support for a
renewed African Renaissance, based not on murderers, but the life
sacrifices of just and righteous leaders, like our Lord Jesus the
Christ from Galilee.

Yours Sincerely
Beert Mouw

Cell: 082 802 7573
16 Njala Street
Middelburg
1050

Sunday, September 7, 2008

Die the beloved country

A Simple Example Of Communal Decline

A Letter From South Africa by Jim Peron (September 1998)

When a country begins sliding into oblivion it really is the little
things that get to you. You wake up in the morning and turn to see
what time it is. The clock is off. The electricity is off again.
Sometimes for a few minutes, sometimes for a few hours, but it seems
to happen more regularly than before.

You pick up the phone at work to make a call. Nothing. Your
neighborhood is without telephone service again. You breathe a sigh of
relief—at least if all the phones are out, they'll do something
relatively soon to fix it. If it's just your own line, it can take
days before they'll do anything.

After the power comes on, you turn on the television to watch a
favorite program, and hope you get the right sound with the right
picture. Sometimes you get the sound of one show with the picture of
another. Sometimes it's just the one or the other. Or a radio station
instead of the soundtrack. You've read the papers—a large number of
the "old" employees have walked out of the broadcasting studios. They
couldn't take it anymore. And since television is an arm of the
government, their replacements are appointed politically, not because
of their experience or ability.

You drive home after going out for dinner. Entire neighborhoods are
without street lights. Well, to be more accurate they are without
lights that work. And the lights have been out for months. The city
has said it won't fix them.

These are the little things in South Africa today. These are the
things that annoy. The big things are too frightening even to
consider.

Kafkaburg

For two years I couldn't get a water/electricity/tax bill from the
city of Johannesburg. Water and electricity are socialist enterprises
here. I didn't have an account number, nor did I know how much to pay.
I tried calling the bureaucrats, but no help there: they said they'd
get back to me, but they didn't.

On September 25th, they showed up to turn off my electricity for
failure to pay. The city workers refused to show identification,
wouldn't say whose account they were turning off, and wouldn't show
any legal authorization to do so. In fact, they told me they didn't
have to speak a language I understood (English). I called the police.
I have a videotape of these civil servants telling me they aren't
obligated to identify themselves, and that if I refused to allow them
on the property they had the right to tear down my gate. When I asked
one of them for anything that would show them to be city workers, he
replied, "This isn't America you know." I know! I know!

I told him, "It's not Nazi Germany, either." He later chastised me for
running down "Nazi Germany." "I'm sorry," I said, "I didn't realize
you were a Nazi."

I went to the city hall and waited hours for someone to see me. I was
finally told to make a plan to pay the account. I was willing. I had
R7,000 (7,000 rand) cash on me. But the bureaucrats wouldn't let me
pay or make a plan. They had forgotten to transfer the account to my
name, you see; it was still in the old owner's name and the bill was
going to the wrong address. I was ordered to wait until they changed
it over and sent me a statement.

I pay a R700 deposit and go. Two days later they turn on the
electricity. Two months later, and still no statement has arrived. I
call and call. "I'll call you back," they say. They don't. I keep
calling. Finally I get a sour bureaucrat who tells me I'll have to pay
R9,000 immediately and the rest over six months. I asked about the
year payment plan. That was discontinued in November. "But I wanted to
pay in October and you people wouldn't let me," I protest. "That's
your problem," she says.

Back at city hall, I see another woman who spends the entire time
screaming at everyone who comes near her. She screams in the phone.
She screams at the switchboard for "bothering" her with phone calls.
She informs me that it's my obligation to pay my account whether or
not the city sends me a statement. It doesn't matter if I don't know
the amount owed. It doesn't matter if I don't have an account number
to which the money is to be credited. My obligation is to pay an
unknown sum into an unknown account, and if I don't get it right
they'll turn off my electricity.

I got off relatively easy, though. Today's newspaper told of one man
who received an account for R500,000 in water use. The man owns a well
and doesn't even use city water. When he went in to talk to the
bureaucrats, they were very sympathetic. They told him to pay 50
percent now or have his electricity cut off.

The Rise of Violence

Recently, I went into a print shop to get some flyers printed. The
woman there was quite pleasant and we talked about the short blackout
that day. She asked what I was doing in South Africa and told me that
she and her family want to flee. Her family originally immigrated from
India; like some Indians she was quite dark. Clearly she was not a
member of the class "privileged" by apartheid. But what she said
surprised me.

"My husband and I decided we were better off under apartheid. Sure now
we can live next to white people and ride the same bus. But those
things aren't important."

What is important? Not being afraid.

Today, the murder rate is ten times greater in South Africa than in
the United States. One world atlas reports: "South Africa is the
world's most dangerous country (beside war zones), with 40,000 murders
a year." It wasn't this way four years ago, before the ANC took power.
But the government says the murders are a "legacy of apartheid."

That's part of the problem. Everything that goes wrong is "a legacy of
apartheid." The violence in the rest of Africa is a "legacy of
colonialism." It's a legacy that has gone on for almost 40 years.
Every time something goes wrong (and that happens constantly), the
same litany of excuses are recited. "We inherited this problem from
the corrupt apartheid regime."

I lived for thirty-some years in the U.S. and never met anyone who had
been shot. I was never near a bank robbery. Never heard of a friend's
car being hijacked. Only one person I knew suffered a burglary.

In the last two years many people I know have been burglarized. In
fact, burglary is so common that people have stopped talking about it.
One of my friends was hit six times in one year. The last time I saw
him I asked what he had done that day. "I got a new TV," he said. "Oh,
how generous of you," I replied. He has since left for England.

White farmers in particular are being targeted. Some, like Werner
Weber, president of the Agricultural Employers Organization, believe
there is an orchestrated campaign to force whites off the land so it
can be redistributed. Farm attacks rise almost every year: 92 killed
in 1994, 121 in 1995, 109 in 1996 and 140 last year. In some attacks
people are murdered but nothing is stolen, indicating that robbery
isn't the motive. Farmer Dudley Leitch told an AEO meeting that while
the murder rate among South Africans in general is 13 per 100,000, it
is 120 per 100,000 for farmers.

A major cellular phone company placed an anti-crime ad in a newspaper
saying, "President Mandela—you were in prison. Now we all are." A top
official of the bureaucracy that regulates telephones called the
company and the ad was withdrawn. I guess it was too rude to state the
obvious.

In America, you don't see what's happening. I know; I watch CNN. It
doesn't even come close to telling the truth about the decline and
death of South Africa. The American media can't tell the truth
now—they have invested too much in telling everyone what a saint
Mandela is.

Meanwhile, we live in prisons. My house has a set of bars on the
outside of the windows and another set inside. I have a Rhodesian
ridgeback dog patrolling the yard. I had a big, spiked,
remote-controlled gate put in the drive. I can't afford the
precautions that others are taking. You now see individual homes with
security guards. Walls over eight feet tall are common, with barbed
wire or spikes on top. Across the street, my neighbors put an electric
fence on the wall—now a commonplace sight. People are armed and have
hired private security companies. In the U.S. following all these
precautions would be considered paranoid. Here it's average.

Police Story

On the street where my bookstore is located, a grocery has been robbed
a couple of times. So were the post office and bank.

In the last few months, four of my customers have been hijacked by
armed gangs, one of them in my parking lot. One was shot through the
leg, another was shot at but missed. Another was beaten and spent
weeks in the hospital. Well over 3,000 hijackings are reported each
year. A family driving to Durban for holiday pulled to the side of the
road so the two little boys could get out and take care of business.
Several hours later the police found the two children sitting against
the bodies of their dead parents; murdered for a car.

The new president of the ANC, Terror Lekota, told the press that the
hijackings are the fault of apartheid. He claims the "apartheid
regime" gave immunity from prosecution to hijackers in exchange for
"intelligence" gathering on the ANC. Last year, another top government
official blamed the spate of hijackings on whites. He said there was
no crime wave at all, and that whites were inventing crimes just to
collect insurance.

The acting head of the Licensing Department for the Johannesburg area,
Gerrie Gerneke, issued a report in July 1997 confirming that the
department was in the control of criminal syndicates. He said that
half of all cars stolen in the Johannesburg area are "legalized" with
new official documents within 30 days of being stolen. He said that
cooperation between criminal gangs and union members has made it
impossible for senior staff members or security staff to take any
action. After Gerneke's report to the government was made, two
anonymous letters accused him of being a racist. As a result of these
anonymous complaints, Gerneke was suspended for five months. A year
later Gerneke says the government has not acted on any of his
recommendations to deal with corruption. When a car theft ring was
recently exposed, five of the 16 individuals arrested were policemen.
The chief investigator said, "We found that policemen were receiving
stolen cars and then selling them to their clients."

In 1997 corruption reached such a level that Mandela appointed a
Special Investigating Unit to look into the matter. According to Judge
Willem Heath, head of the unit, there are currently more than 90,000
cases under investigation. If Heath and his crew manage to resolve one
case of corruption per day, including weekends and holidays, it will
take about 247 years to clear the current backlog. This doesn't
include any new cases that will arise. Heath thinks the cases involve
a sum of around 6 billion rand.

In 1997 approximately 2,300 police officers were charged with
corruption —just about one every three hours. Almost 500 police
officers have appeared in court on charges of working with criminal
gangs. In the Johannesburg area alone 700 police officers are facing
trials for committing crimes ranging from murder to burglary. And
everyone assumes this is only the tip of the iceberg.

Over the last two years, there have been dozens of major highway
robberies. In broad daylight gangs of a dozen men armed with AK-47s
and other "military" weapons attack security trucks carrying large
amounts of cash. These robberies have netted millions for the gangs.
Government officials blame security companies, banks, and anyone else
they can think of. But some arrests have finally been made, the
ringleaders have turned out to be ANC activists. The leaders who were
arrested were officials in the so-called "armed wing" of the ANC,
Umkhonto weSizwe. One gang leader had been Youth League secretary for
the Johannesburg area. A close associate of his, also a gang leader,
was arrested but "escaped" from jail. Both were recent guests at the
birthday party of Peter Mokaba, Deputy Minister of Environmental
Affairs and Tourism. There is evidence that Umkhonto weSizwe activists
are not only behind some of the robberies, but that they are working
with other armed cadres associated with so-called liberation movements
from bordering countries.

In 1997 alone, there were 465 bank robberies. In all about $40 million
was taken. Banks are raising their fees substantially to compensate
for the losses.

Crime seems to be the only thing that works in South Africa—the risk
of being arrested, tried and convicted is minuscule. In 1997, only
14.6 percent of murders led to arrest and conviction. Of 52,110 rapes
there were only 2,532 convictions—about 6.7 percent. For the 330,093
burglaries there were 15,710 convictions, about 4.8 percent.

Experienced prosecutors have quit their jobs, replaced by novices who
owe their positions to affirmative action.

During the 1997 Christmas season, the police and prisons "lost" almost
300 prisoners. In one instance a policeman took two prisoners to a bar
for drinks. One of them borrowed his keys and returned to the jail to
release 23 other prisoners. At another jail nine prisoners walked out,
leaving behind a note: "We are out for Christmas and will be back on
January 3." (They didn't come back.) Several prisoners left a police
van when guards didn't bother locking it.

In 1995, Sylvester Mofokeng was taken out of his cell for a soccer
game. When he was returning to prison, he simply jumped out of the
truck and ran through gates that were left unlocked. He was rearrested
three months later, but in August 1996 he escaped again. Somehow he
obtained a gun from a visitor and used it to force guards to release
him.

Josiah Rabotapi is believed to be the leader of an armed robbery
syndicate involved in the theft of up to $14 million in 30 armed
robberies. He is also wanted for 16 murders. So far he has been
arrested three times and escaped every time. Jan van der Westhuizen, a
convicted murderer, has escaped from prison or police custody seven
times.

When the police aren't "losing" criminals, they are killing them. A
recent government report showed that one person dies every twelve
hours either while in police custody or as a result of police action.
Two-thirds of these deaths take place during apprehension. According
to one report, "an overview of 100 shooting incidents between police
and civilians" showed a heavy "imbalance in casualties." David Bruce,
a researcher for the Centre for the Study of Violence and
Reconciliation said, "In only five of the cases was a policeman hurt,
and in one case a policeman was killed."

In the northern suburbs of Johannesburg, citizens are fighting back.
In some areas they have put security guards at the entrance to a
subdivision. Entrances are closed off with gates to control who comes
in and who goes out. Criminals can no longer simply load their cars
with stolen goods and speed out when security guards stop them at the
gate. These areas have seen dramatic reductions in crime. But the ANC
has ordered the gates removed. It claims these efforts force crime
away from white areas and are therefore racist.

This is life in South Africa today.

I've lived in South Africa for six years and I've seen a lot of
changes. Even a few for the good. But the standard of living has
declined. And people's attitudes have changed: hope is gone, replaced
by fear, anxiety, even horror. There is a joke going around: Americans
have Bill Clinton, Johnny Cash and Bob Hope. South Africans have
Nelson Mandela, no cash and no hope.

The Return of Apartheid

Another popular joke is that Mickey Mouse has a watch with the picture
of our Ministers of Finance. In the six years that I have lived here
the South African rand has depreciated by 50 percent. In just the last
year it has dropped 30 percent.

The government has conducted a massive "jobs" program. But since the
ANC has taken power the number of jobs has declined, despite sanctions
being lifted and increased trade with the rest of the world. The only
job increases are in government departments.

South African workers are not particularly productive. But the
government has been pushing new labor legislation that continues to
drive up the cost of South African labor. No wonder that fewer and
fewer South Africans are employed.

The ANC is pushing a new "Equity Employment" bill through Parliament.
This bill will force all employers to reserve a number of jobs for
blacks. Businesses that don't comply with the mandatory racial quotas
face heavy fines. And so apartheid is back—the old laws in new
packaging.

Recently, ANC members of Parliament have announced that they intend to
introduce legislation applying racial quotas to sports. Specifically,
the government wants to control rugby, a sport played traditionally by
whites (unlike soccer, which is dominated by blacks). Mandela ordered
a commission to investigate racism in the South African Rugby Football
Union. SARFU took the issue to court and the court ruled against the
commission. ANC officials then proclaimed the judge an unpatriotic
racist for requiring Mandela to testify on why the commission was
created.

ANC MPs, unable to get control of rugby legally, resorted to
intimidation. They announced on the floor of Parliament that unless
the leadership of SARFU resigns, ANC members will forcibly close
airports to prevent other rugby teams from entering South Africa.
Major corporations, all fearful of the ANC, threatened to remove
financial support from SARFU unless the ANC got its way. Rugby head
Louis Luyt, who had defeated an ANC partisan for the job, was forced
out by the threats. After Luyt resigned, SARFU apologized to Mandela
for making him go to court.

Communists in Government

The government of South Africa is actually a coalition of three
groups. The ruling triple alliance is made up of the Congress of South
African Trade Unions (COSATU), the South African Communist Party
(SACP), and the African National Congress (ANC), which leads the
coalition. The SACP has a lot of influence in COSATU and together they
exercise a great deal of control over the ANC. Thabo Mbeki, who just
replaced Mandela as leader of the ANC, and is pegged to be president
of South Africa when Mandela steps down, was trained in Moscow. His
father, Govan, is an old line Marxist and SACP activist. At a recent
ANC conference the hard left solidified its control over the ANC by
capturing nine of its eleven top positions. Of the ANC's 240 MPs in
Parliament, 80 were appointed by the SACP. The ANC and COSATU also
used some of their quotas to appoint SACP members to Parliament.

When Chris Hani was assassinated by Janus Waluz, a Polish immigrant,
CNN called Hani, "a top ANC official" or "anti-apartheid activist."
But CNN didn't mention that Hani was the head of the Communist Party
and that Waluz was a refugee from communism. Instead, the impression
was given that Hani was another Martin Luther King.

In the same way, many facts about Mandela and the ANC are never
reported by the media. For example, Mandela awarded South Africa's
equivalent of the U.S. Presidential Medal of Freedom to Libya's
Muammar al-Qaddafi. Mandela has publicly said that Cuba is a model for
a free, democratic society that is, in fact, more democratic than the
United States. Castro has been here for friendly visits. When U.S.
officials complained about Mandela's cozy relationship with dictators,
Mandela said that no other nation has the right to interfere in South
African affairs—this from the man who supported sanctions against the
old government. Curiously, Mandela dropped recognition of Taiwan at
the demand of Communist China.

The ANC's Bill of Wrongs

Gay rights are now enshrined in South Africa's Bill of Rights. Gay
publications around the world have praised the ANC for this. But in
fact gay sex remains illegal. The government has taken no practical
steps to legalize homosexuality. When a gay rights group took the
sodomy laws to the Constitutional Court, the government opposed its
effort. After a world-wide outcry, the government backed down. It
appears the ANC is hoping the courts throw out the law, thereby taking
credit for being pro-gay while not being responsible for the change.
Yet the South African government continues to deny foreign gay
partners of South Africans the right to stay in the country legally.
The issue is in court, but the government is opposed to changes in the
policy.

The ruling ideology is that "there are no absolute rights," so the ANC
put "weasel" clauses into the Bill of Rights. Any right guaranteed by
the Constitution can be ignored. For instance, the right to engage in
enterprise is absolute—unless infringed "by law." Thus the government
can do what it wants since it passes the laws. Other constitutional
clauses say rights can be limited by government consistent with the
operation of an "open" and "democratic" society. And remember, Mandela
considers Cuba democratic.

The bill of rights negotiated by various political parties guaranteed
freedom of speech. Repressive censorship laws were relegated to the
dustbin. But the ANC has been pulling them back out and wiping them
off.

A bill to repeal censorship was introduced in Parliament. I even
testified in favor of it. The bill was mediocre but livable. Later,
the ANC rewrote it in secret and passed it without making a written
version available. The new bill actually creates a censorship body.
All videos and films must be approved by the censorship board before
they can be distributed. So-called "x-rated" material can be sold only
in licensed adult shops. Anything deemed "hate speech" is illegal. The
new "obscenity" standard is that anything "degrading" is illegal.
Another victory for clear, concise legal concepts.

Lindiwe Sisulu, deputy minister of home affairs, said the government
"tries" to balance free speech with the rights of "society, in
reality, however, there can never be an absolute balance." This means
"not all speech can be equally protected." Sisulu interprets the new
censorship legislation much more strictly than in the past. She claims
that "anyone who downloads pornography from the Internet will commit
an offense." Note that she has broadened this beyond the act which
banned "degrading" pornography, bestiality, child porn, and hate
speech. Now she says that any downloaded porn is illegal. Expanding
the prior censorship of films and videos, Sisulu says all photos must
be classified by the government before distribution. "No person may
screen a film or photograph, including on a computer screen, which has
not been classified by the Publications Board. This means that anyone
placing material on the Internet must have a classification
certificate for that material." In other words the government now
claims the right to classify—and ban—all photographs before they are
distributed to anyone.

Yet the ANC stills finds the bill of rights too restrictive of
government. Peter Mokaba recently gave a speech in a black area
demanding that all blacks vote for the ANC so it can get two-thirds
control of Parliament. He said this would allow it to rewrite the
constitution and end all restrictions on government power. ANC
secretary general Kgalema Motlanthe said that if the ANC won
two-thirds control in the next election, it could govern "unfettered
by constraints."

Supine and Pusillanimous

In the last four years, the nation's largest string of newspapers has
lost its independence from the government after being taken over by
Irish press baron Tony O'Reilly. O'Reilly's Independent group is cozy
with the ANC. An article in The Times of London says O'Reilly has been
criticized for "his unhealthily close relationship with the ANC
government. He began by appointing an advisory board stacked with ANC
supporters and has been vocal in his support for all manner of ANC
causes and watchwords." Journalists have been unhappy that O'Reilly
brought in his biographer, Ivan Fallon, to run the newspapers because
Fallon "is disliked for his refusal to stand up to Government attempts
to bully the press into uncritical support."

According to The Times O'Reilly's newspapers have downplayed scandals
within the ANC government. In the Virodene scandal, ANC politicians
promoted—and still promote—the so-called AIDS drug. Documents show
that the company producing the drug was planning to offer a six
percent share of the profits to the ANC. O'Reilly's papers "have
played down the whole matter, neglecting to cover key press
conferences."

Other newspapers, however, still manage to criticize the government,
and the ANC and Mandela don't like it. Mandela constantly attacks the
press for being "opposed" to the "transformation." In fact the press,
on the whole, was staunchly critical of apartheid. Still, Mandela says
the media, with the exception of television, are racist. In the next
few years, legislation directed against the newspapers is almost
certain. Mandela's hero, Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe, wiped out
recalcitrant newspapers by simply turning them over to the government.

Television is exempt from Mandela's criticisms because the three main
television stations are already controlled by the government. ANC
officials run the stations and they are often deathly silent about the
problems in South Africa. But they do have time for endless
documentaries on Mandela and the ANC, with titles like "Our Heroes."
One new news director is a long-time ANC supporter with no
broadcasting experience.

Two new mini-series have been produced for the coming season: one is a
glowing film about the life of communist Helen Joseph and her fight
for the ANC, and the other is about ANC partisan Bishop Tutu. A new
television series, funded by the Labour Ministry, is called "Let's
Talk." A recent episode showed the workers, all of whom are called
"comrades," on strike. The owner of the factory, who for some reason
had an American accent, locked out the strikers. But the company
management didn't know how to build their own product, houses, and
built them upside down! The government and the trade unions seem to
believe that entrepreneurs and management are useless, and that all
productivity comes from labor.

The South African Broadcasting System's political allegiances are no
secret: one station's promotional commercial shows its on-air talent
in "rainbow" clothing and marching with colorful flags to triumphant
music. Several flags feature the face of Mandela. In another Stalinoid
presentation, the television producers' award show included a musical
number with the chorus, "Oh, Mandela, we sing praise to you." Not long
ago, the son of the former president of the ANC, Oliver Tambo, who
hosts an SABC talk show, ran an hour-long special praising media mogul
Tony O'Reilly. No doubt the fact that O'Reilly has cuddled up to the
ANC had nothing to do with the praise heaped upon him.

Fascism, South African Style

Civil society is being politicized. Everything must be solidified in
the hands of the State and the State must be in the hands of the ANC.

Last year the government nationalized all water resources in South
Africa. Under new legislation it will be illegal to dig a well without
prior approval from the central government. The ANC attacked critics
of the legislation as "racist whites" who want to protect their luxury
swimming pools. Meanwhile the new rulers admit they can't find 45
percent of all the water shipped to Johannesburg. Only 55 percent of
the water is metered out—the rest simply disappears. But considering
that meters are found almost exclusively in white areas, while black
areas have unmetered taps, this should be no surprise.

But water is only the camel's nose in the tent. The ANC Minister of
Mineral Affairs, Penuell Maduna, called for the nationalization of all
minerals, saying that "private ownership of mineral rights is
unacceptable to the government." Government spokesmen call private
ownership "racist" because not everyone owns mineral rights in a
private system. Maduna previously floated the idea that the government
should also control all oil companies. Under the current system, price
competition in petrol is forbidden and all prices are set by the
government.

The hospitals in South Africa have become nightmares. Two years ago
Mandela announced free medical care for children. The hospitals are
now filled with unemployed women and their children. They sit there
for hours to have a cough or a runny nose checked.

Dr. Zuma, Minister of Health, seems determined to make health care in
South Africa equally bad everywhere. She has conscripted all medical
students to be servants. They are to give two years of their lives to
the State, to do what the State orders, anywhere the State orders. The
legislation doesn't even specify that the service has to be in South
Africa. Speculation is that at least some will be assigned to Cuba.

When it was pointed out to Zuma that huge numbers of doctors and
medical students are now emigrating, she called them "traitors," and
attributed their fleeing to "racism." Wits School of Medicine reported
that 45 percent of all students who graduated in the last 35 years
have already left the country. A recent survey of the top doctors in
South Africa revealed the almost unanimous opinion that Zuma is
destroying the nation's health-care system. The Independent wrote,
"Many doctors said that Zuma's apparent intention to introduce a
communist or socialist national health system was stifling private
practice and initiative. This, coupled with excessive control and
interference, has left doctors despondent." A spokesman for Zuma
responded by saying that if the proposals are "seen as socialist, then
we will continue to do so and offer no apologies."

The destruction of health care has even affected the food supply.
Vaccines that are urgently needed to protect livestock have run out.
The only legal source for purchasing the vaccines in South Africa is
through the government, and the government labs are empty. Farmers who
send in their checks to buy the vaccines have the money returned. The
top veterinary scientists are also leaving the country. At the
Onderstepoort Research Centre only one of the original six specialists
is still there. Onderstepoort, once considered one of the best
research centers in the world, is now limping along. Scientists say
there is a good chance that mutated viruses will decimate the beef,
pork, and lamb industries before new vaccines can be developed. They
warn that the public should expect a shortage of meat and milk as a
result.

Under the old apartheid regime, government schools in black areas were
woefully deficient. When the ANC took over the education system things
changed. Now all the schools are woefully deficient.—equality has been
achieved. But the number of students graduating from high school has
declined under the ANC. Those who do well in school prosper only if
they are the right color. The student who passed more courses with
distinction than any other student in South Africa can't even get a
scholarship. Each application he has made has been rejected because
he's the wrong color. He has the best scholastic record in the country
but no one cares. It isn't wise to give money to anyone not approved
by the ANC.

In the Eastern Cape, near Port Elizabeth, is the impoverished Khwezi
Lomso Comprehensive School. The principal is Cecilia Behrent. During
her tenure the school has achieved a pass rate of 84 percent, well
above the national rate of 47 percent and double that of the
provincial pass rate of 42 percent. The teachers' union, in
cooperation with the government, has been trying to have a union
official replace Behrent, who is white. Her ouster is opposed by
almost every one of her 1,100 students, almost all the teachers, and
over 700 parents who have signed a petition on her behalf. The
government refused to accept the petition.

Johannesburg Besieged

Johannesburg was a relatively safe and clean city when I moved here. I
moved into a racially mixed area in the city center. I left a year
later. Today, I won't drive there in broad daylight. The streets are
controlled by criminals. Some gangs sit at street corners and rob
passing motorists. They break the car window, take what they want,
pile it on the curb, and then wait for another car. They don't even
run with the stolen goods. They don't need to; no one will arrest
them.

Residents of my old neighborhood, Hillbrow, have discovered a new
game: take cans of trash and throw them from 15th floor windows at
pedestrians. The streets are filthy and reek of urine. Businesses are
moving out. The luxury Carleton Hotel held on for awhile but finally
gave up the ghost. No one would stay there, so the hotel closed its
200-plus rooms, and now sits empty.

Mayhem reigned on New Year's Eve. In the Hillbrow section of the city,
nearly 200 police officers patrolled an area of just a few square
blocks —to no apparent effect. Three people were murdered on the
streets that evening. Police who tried to stop looters were pelted
from the high-rise apartment buildings. Paramedics were attacked when
they tried to aid the injured.

So the ANC took action. Johannesburg is a massive city, and the ANC
promised to break its management into several regions. "Local control"
would then be achieved with four gerrymandered districts. Each
district was drawn in the most convoluted way possible, ensuring that
each had enough blacks. The ANC knows where its voters live.

The city hired thousands and thousands of new bureaucrats. In many
cases two people did the same job—one black worker with the title and
one white worker to do the work. Money was redistributed to the
"previously disadvantaged." While black townships haven't improved,
white areas have declined. Now Johannesburg, once the wealthiest city
in Africa, can't pay its bills, and can't get bank loans. It went from
budget surplus to bankruptcy in just two years. More ANC magic.

This black magic is being worked throughout South Africa. The
British-based Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy
recently said that 281 municipalities in South Africa are now
technically bankrupt. That's one out of every three cities in the
country.

Public parks are now squatter camps. Broken water mains gush for days
before they're fixed. Pot holes remain unrepaired. The city budget
allocates less than $100,000 for street repairs for the entire city!
Inefficiency reigns. Under questioning in Parliament, ANC officials
admitted that roads in Gauteng have deteriorated under their
management. Transport Minister Mac Maharaj admitted that only 37
percent of the roads were in good or very good condition in 1997 where
this was true of 80 percent of the roads in 1985.

The Political Struggle

In Johannesburg the opposition party to the ANC is the Democratic
Party DP). Once a leading anti-apartheid party, it is now the only
real opposition to the ANC left, and it has become increasingly
libertarian. It supports the rights of gay people and free enterprise.
It opposes affirmative action and censorship.

The northern suburbs are now staunch DP territory. And they are in a
tax revolt. The government responds by sending in armed goons to
terrorize elderly couples. The ANC isn't happy. My area is the one
area where the ANC doesn't have a clear majority. It can't institute
one party rule here, so it intimidates, punishes, and withdraws basic
city services.

To counter the opposition, the ANC now plans to make the entire
Johannesburg area a "mega city." No more regions. The DP areas will be
swamped "democratically" by ANC supporters, allowing the ANC to
continue to steal from DP voters and give to ANC bureaucrats.

Critics of the mega city were, of course, branded "racists". (Today,
that term has lost all meaning in South Africa. In fact, if you're not
labeled a "racist" one time or another, you're simply not a decent
human being.) Various community groups asked for a referendum. The ANC
said that was undemocratic, and wouldn't have it.

Local DP politician Frances Kendall called for a private referendum.
Hundreds of voting booths were established throughout the city. The
ANC ordered its supporters not to vote. In black areas voting booths
were harassed and intimidated into closing. Then the ANC said the vote
didn't count because there weren't enough voting booths in black
areas. Just under 100,000 people voted. The vote was overwhelmingly
against the "mega city". The ANC said it didn't care and would ignore
it. After all the poll only expressed the views of racists.

When the ANC won power, the election was declared "free and fair" by
European Community observers. One observer admitted to a Federal Party
official that the election would be declared corrupt if judged by
European standards, "but this is Africa." For instance, more voters
voted than existed. A recent census showed the population at under 39
million, not 44 million as previously claimed. Since more than half
the population consists of children, there can't be more than 19
million voters in the country. Yet more than 19 million cast ballots.
No one seems to care that the ANC was elected with millions of
fraudulent votes.

I was receiving hourly vote tallies by fax from the Independent
Electoral Commission. I remember my amazement when I noticed that the
vote total for the Federal Party was higher at 6 p.m. than at 7 p.m.
Votes were disappearing. Vote counting went on for days when suddenly
it stopped. For two days no results were released. IEC officials met
with political party officials behind closed doors before the final
results were negotiated and announced.

For the last several years the ANC has done everything possible to
manipulate the voting system to increase its totals. First, it
proposed that the voting age be reduced to 14 years since the
overwhelming majority of youths are black. Public ridicule has quashed
this proposal for the time being. Next, the ANC tried to change the
laws so that non-citizens could vote provided they were from
"neighboring," i.e. black, countries. Because most white non-citizens
are from England, Canada, the United States, etc. the white vote
wouldn't have increased. Opposition parties managed to kill this
proposal as well.

Instead, the ANC achieved the same goal through the back door. The
vast majority of "illegal" immigrants in South Africa are blacks from
neighboring countries. The ANC granted them immediate citizenship.
Meanwhile, "legal" immigrants, who are mainly whites from Western
countries, find it increasingly difficult to stay in South Africa.
Permanent residency for "legal" immigrants has become more difficult
to receive, and the cost of simply applying has increased from less
than $100 to over $1,400.

The National Party (NP), once South Africa's dominant party, is fast
losing support. It has never really opposed the ANC on anything, and
it has made numerous backroom deals with the ANC to retain privileges
for its leaders. The job of standing up to the ANC is filled by the
"liberal" Democratic Party.

The DP has contested by-elections recently in several NP strongholds.
In each case the DP handily beat the NP candidate. White voters no
longer trust the NP, and with good reason. In the most recent local
election the DP garnered 90 percent of the votes. Just before the
election a top NP official said this seat was the NP's "safest" in the
country. But the ANC is launching a counter-offensive.

DP activists, many of whom were arrested for denouncing apartheid, are
now branded racists by the ANC. ANC media mouthpieces refer to the
"liberal racists" of the DP. ANC officials call liberals "bigots" and
use the term "conservative liberals" to denegrate ANC critics. Party
officials regularly give speeches denouncing critics as being
"unpatriotic." And recently they have started claiming that whites are
preventing its programs from succeeding.

Mandela openly denounces the DP as racist. His objective is to
sideline the DP. Of all the opposition parties—outside the Inkatha
Freedom Party, which is strictly Zulu-based—only the DP has a hope of
attracting black support. It must be destroyed if a one-party ANC
state is to be constructed.

What happens depends largely on how the rest of the world views South
Africa. If there is sufficient criticism and publicity, the would-be
ANC dictators will back down. They have before and will again. But the
ANC is whittling away at the rule of law and the world isn't saying
very much. The ANC won't ban its opposition outright—at least not in
the immediate future. Total government control of all the media isn't
in the cards yet either—but the newspapers will be attacked in the
guise of promoting "diversity." But there is a hope. International
pressure and continued support for the DP may at least hold things
off.

But the odds are against it. South Africa will most likely walk the
road to misery, corruption, despair and destruction. Give it time. It
won't be any different here than in the rest of Africa.

Source:ourcivilisation.com

http://www.ourcivilisation.com/die.htm

Why the title "Die, The Beloved Country"

Fifty years ago (1948) Alan Paton wrote a book " Cry, The Beloved
Country" about the horrors of apartheid in South Africa. It was an
overnight best seller, which was eventually translated into more than
20 languages and became a set book in schools all over the world. To
date it has sold more than 15 million copies and still sells 100,000
copies a year.

The sentiments in the prose which proved so popular have now been
embraced with the abandonment of apartheid, with predictable and
unpleasant results. So by altering one word of this famous title, the
true effects of the change are described.

Death has prevented the author witnessing the achievement of his
dreams, but his widow is still alive and has written a letter to the
London Times explaining why she is now fleeing the country her husband
loved.

Friday, September 5, 2008

Helen Zille : SA Today - The Constitution 1; Power Abuse 0

A weekly letter from the Leader of the Democratic Alliance 5 September 2008
The Constitution 1; Power Abuse 0


Much ink has flowed over the Erasmus Commission of Inquiry, but what
few commentators have grasped is this: on Monday, when the Cape High
Court ruled that the Commission was unlawful and unconstitutional,
South Africa passed a litmus test of constitutional democracy.
What is that test?
It is when the ruling party's efforts to defeat its political
opponents through means other than the ballot box are rejected by
those institutions which the Constitution entrusts to limit – and
prevent – the abuse of state power.
As the High Court found, the Erasmus Commission was nothing but an
illegal attempt by the ANC provincial government to embarrass and
discredit the DA. The ANC's strategy was two-fold:
Firstly, it was an attempt to divide the multi-party coalition in Cape
Town so that it could take back the City. This became clear in May
when Jacob Zuma said: "We should not allow anyone to govern our city
[Cape Town] when we are ruling the country." The ANC has never
accepted its defeat in Cape Town; the Erasmus Commission was simply
another (and the most sophisticated) attempt to unseat the DA outside
of the electoral process.
Secondly, the establishment of the Erasmus Commission was part of a
strategy to prevent the DA from winning the Western Cape election next
year. The ANC believed that if it could smear the DA by giving a host
of aggrieved and dubious characters a public platform (under the guise
of judicial impartiality), it might be able to retain the Western Cape
despite the odds that are increasingly stacked against it.
The former Premier Ebrahim Rasool knew that executing this strategy on
behalf of the ANC would be his best chance of surviving the purge of
Mbeki allies that was always imminent when the political sands in the
ANC had begun to shift in favour of Jacob Zuma. Of course, this did
not work; once the ANC realised that the Erasmus Commission would
never withstand the scrutiny of the courts, Rasool was removed from
office and redeployed.
I said this week that the Court's verdict is not a victory for one
political party or even the City of Cape Town alone. It is a victory
for the Constitution. It shows that the judiciary is prepared and
willing to check the ruling party when it abuses state power in an
attempt to deprive its political opponents of power.
Because the DA and I (with the Desai Commission indelibly etched in
our memories), knew that the Erasmus Commission was nothing but an
unconstitutional smear campaign, we opposed it implacably. We knew
that allowing the ANC to abuse power in this way would set a
dangerous, and perhaps even irrevocable, precedent for our
constitutional democracy.
The allegations against us of illegal spying were a fabrication from
the start to give a cloak of legitimacy to all the illegal and
unconstitutional activities that followed. So too was the falsehood
that the City Council had paid for an investigation undertaken by the
DA. I welcomed the police investigation into these allegations and
called for us to be charged in a court of law if there was any
evidence of wrongdoing. This never materialised; instead the Premier
chose to bypass the police, the prosecuting authority and the courts
in order to set up his own political commission.
We made all these points at the time, but they were understood only by
a handful of commentators and journalists. The majority gleefully
seized on the possibility that it was the DA for once, and not the
ANC, that might have been involved in wrongdoing.
There were three main criticisms levelled at us when we decided to
fight the establishment of the Commission.
Firstly, several columnists, leader writers and satirists accused the
DA, the City of Cape Town, and me personally of rejecting the Erasmus
Commission because we wanted to conceal the truth.
In The Star, Jovial Rantao said: "What has Helen Zille got to hide?
What is it that the Democratic Alliance is desperately trying to keep
away from the public? What is it that the City of Cape Town, run by
the DA, is trying to hide from the ratepayers?"
Pierre de Vos, a Professor of Constitutional Law, no less, declared:
"One would have thought that if the DA – and Zille in particular – had
nothing to hide, it would welcome the chance to clear its name through
such a commission of inquiry".
That the City had asked Advocate Josie Jordaan SC to conduct an
exhaustive inquiry into whether the City had broken any law in
carrying out its investigation into Councillor Chaaban was lost on
them. So, too, was the fact that the City had opened up all its files
to the police to investigate, and withheld nothing. Despite a full and
protracted police investigation, no evidence emerged that the City of
Cape Town had contravened any law, or that the DA had engaged in
illegal spying. No charges were laid.
Even the interim report of the Erasmus Commission found that neither
the City nor the DA had engaged in illegal spying. The great irony is
that the only person who was illegally spied upon was me. My cellphone
records were illegally subpoenaed from Vodacom by the Erasmus
Commission and handed to the ANC. It was my home phone that was found
to be tapped at the time of the Erasmus Commission.
The simple reason for resisting the Erasmus Commission was because, as
far as we were concerned, in the absence of any charges or evidence to
the contrary, we had done nothing wrong. Why would we allow an
unconstitutional political hit squad set up by the ANC to smear us
through lies and innuendo that would be reported every day in the
media as if they were fact?
Secondly, I was roundly condemned for the comment I made on radio
that, "some judges allow themselves to be abused, and unfortunately
Nathan Erasmus is one of them".
At the time of my statement, the Cape Argus claimed that "…Zille has
resorted to…a ploy that…threatens to undermine the judiciary". The
Sunday Times suggested that my statement contained "the dangerous
accusation that a member of the judiciary is serving the interests of
a political party". Professor De Vos argued that my comment was "no
different from the ANC Youth League and Young Communist League
diatribes and shows a scandalous disregard for our Constitution".
What these commentators never grasped was that the Commission was not
a court and its chairman was not acting in his capacity as a judge;
therefore he could not expect the deference due to a judicial process.
This view has now been vindicated in the Cape High Court. Yet, as
recently as Wednesday, an editorial in Die Burger stated that
"although Zille is right [to have criticised Erasmus], she is also
wrong". The implication is that somehow my statement about Erasmus
constituted an attack on the independence of the judiciary.
In fact, it was Erasmus's acceptance of an appointment to a political
commission that undermined the independence of the judiciary, not my
criticism of him for doing so. In choosing to ignore the
Constitutional Court guidelines that "judges should not get entangled
in matters of political controversy", Erasmus opened himself up to
legitimate criticism.
The court ruling itself notes that it was inappropriate for a judge to
head a commission of inquiry which was so clearly political in nature,
as this risked compromising the independence of the judiciary. It
states: "That the government would want to use judges for their
purposes is one matter but that judges should allow themselves to be
used is quite a different one... The notion of being used by the
executive in this way is anathema to the judicial calling and is the
very antithesis of the separation of powers".
The third line of attack against us was that, by resisting the Erasmus
Commission, I was becoming bogged down in a local issue. The Cape
Argus accused me of suffering from "anxiety attacks" and asked: "Were
those critics right who suggested that it would be problematic for one
person to be both mayor and leader of the DA?"
Those who argued that I was allowing a parochial issue to distract me
from more pressing national matters missed the fundamental point that
the Erasmus Commission would have profound national repercussions if
it were allowed to continue. If the ANC could get away with this kind
of unconstitutional action, why would it ever have to accept the
result of an election that went against it anywhere?
We fought the Commission because it was power abuse and because we
agree with the old cliché that "bad things happen when good men do
nothing." Power abuse – particularly at a time when the ANC is making
menacing sounds about the Constitution – must be stopped in its tracks
wherever it occurs.
There are some who argue that it is hypocritical of the DA to have
opposed the Erasmus Commission but not the Zuma trial. They draw
parallels with the Erasmus Commission and what they believe is the
"selective prosecution" – a form of power abuse – by one ANC faction
to discredit another.
The key difference is that Zuma is before a court of law; the DA and
the City were not. The parallel would only have credence if a police
investigation had failed to provide the basis of a credible charge
against Zuma in court, only for President Mbeki to sidestep the
criminal justice system and set up an illegal commission anyway,
handpicking his own judge to chair it, in order to conduct a political
witch-hunt to discredit Zuma. If this had happened, it would have been
credible to talk about persecution. However it did not. Zuma is being
properly prosecuted through the criminal justice system.
As we move forward, we can be encouraged that we have a Constitution
and a judiciary that effectively protect us from power abuse by the
ANC. The High Court ruling marks a watershed judgment on the
separation of powers and the prevention of power abuse by the ruling
party. At a time when the ANC often seems to disregard the
constitutional constraints on its power, the fact that the courts have
acted decisively and emphatically is something from which we can all
take heart.
Best Wishes

Thursday, September 4, 2008

Business Brief : September 2008 - Issue # 7

September 2008 - Issue #7
In this issue:
INTRODUCTORY LETTER

DA WILL SUPPORT MBOWENI'S CONTINUED TERM OF OFFICE

SCRAP SETAs AND GIVE EMPLOYERS TAX BREAKS

ESKOM DOWNGRADING – DA CALLS FOR GOVERNMENT ACTION

DA CALLS ON SAA CEO AND BOARD CHAIRMAN TO ACCOUNT FOR FINANCIAL WOES
AT THE NATIONAL CARRIER

REAL PICTURE BEHIND 2008 'DEVELOPMENTAL INDICATORS' NOT SO ROSY

DA CALLS FOR URGENT REMOVAL OF IMPORT QUOTAS ON CHINESE TEXTILES

DA WELCOMES LAUNCH OF VENTURE CAPITAL FUND TO AID ENTREPRENEURS

INTRODUCTORY LETTER

While the Democratic Alliance shares the concerns of South Africans
everywhere who are being squeezed by rising food and energy prices,
the COSATU leadership's entirely self-interested and narrow-minded
response to this problem last month makes no constructive contribution
to the debate about how to reduce the burden of the country's economic
hardships.

Moreover, the personal threats to cabinet ministers (including a
highly inappropriate and threatening gesture by Zwelinzima Vavi
towards Finance Minister Trevor Manuel) who do not follow "pro-poor"
policies adopted in Polokwane demonstrate a reprehensible level of
intolerance that we should not put up with in a democratic society.

The recent series of protests, strikes and stay-aways organised by
COSATU only serves to undermine much-needed economic growth, compounds
poverty, and in the end, undermines efforts to reduce the unacceptably
high level of unemployment in South Africa.

COSATU's increasingly militant stance is anything but noble and
high-minded; rather it is part of a concerted political strategy to
increase its own influence within the tripartite-alliance. This is an
approach which is both dangerous and short-sighted, because the South
African economy - especially within already hard-hit sectors such as
mining and manufacturing - is being dealt yet another blow by the
non-attendance of its work force.

If COSATU is serious about addressing spiralling inflation and other
economic problems then it should rather announce that it will abandon
the very policies which have helped contribute to the current economic
downturn and to chronic unemployment.

It is because of Cosatu's insistence on an inflexible labour regime
that millions of South Africans have been shut out from the formal job
market, and initiatives such as a dual labour market - which would
offers thousands, if not millions of young South Africans the prospect
of formal employment - have not been implemented .

Instead of resorting to knee-jerk, interventionist policy responses,
such as regulating food prices or imposing export restrictions, the DA
advocates the provision of targeted assistance to help alleviate the
crisis caused by rising prices, which includes; the provision of basic
income grants; the use of food vouchers in cases of extreme crisis;
extending the list of items zero rated for value added tax (VAT); and
supplementary feeding programmes (SFPs), such as school feeding
schemes or food for work programmes, which would provide a direct
transfer of food to targeted individuals.

South Africa is beset by growth-reducing structural constraints such
as infrastructure deficiencies, chronic unemployment, a debilitating
skills crisis, a lack of entrepreneurship and more recently,
uncertainty regarding the future of property rights in South Africa.

These constraints must be urgently addressed through an
enterprise-driven economy which promotes growth-centred policies –
such as price stability, fiscal prudence, a deregulated labour market,
accelerated privatisation and greater public-private partnerships; not
by public grandstanding, which will further erode the productive base
of the economy.

Kind Regards

Kobus Marais MP

DA SPOKESPERSON ON FINANCE

Back to menu >>


DA WILL SUPPORT MBOWENI'S CONTINUED TERM OF OFFICE

The Democratic Alliance welcomes the announcement by Reserve Bank
Governor Tito Mboweni that he will make himself available to serve
another term of office if asked to.

"The DA would welcome the continuation of Mboweni's term of office in
the new dispensation," said DA deputy spokesperson on finance Deon
George in September.

"The Reserve Bank has throughout Mboweni's term created a stable,
certain monetary policy environment, which to some extent has boosted
investors' confidence in the economy. He has had an excellent record
at the central bank and has maintained the independence of the bank in
a commendable fashion."

George said that now, more than ever, South Africa could not afford
any policy missteps which would undermine confidence in the economy.

"At a time when our economy is facing daunting socio-economic
challenges, boosting investor confidence is not an option – it is
mandatory. South Africa is part of the international financial
community and, as such, the reality of global and investor sentiments
must be taken into account; certainly key policy decisions such as the
appointment of the Central Bank governor play a crucial role in
boosting investor confidence," said George.

"It would be tragic if the Reserve Bank's hard won credibility was
compromised under the new ANC government by COSATU's concerted
political strategy to increase its own influence within the
tripartite-alliance by undermining monetary policy with its misplaced
ideas on inflation targeting."

Back to menu >>

SCRAP SETAs AND GIVE EMPLOYERS TAX BREAKS

The sector education and training authorities (Setas) should be
scrapped and replaced with a tax rebate scheme for skills development
by employers, the Democratic Alliance said in August.

"Many billions of rands have been pumped into Setas over the past
seven years - at least R4.6 billion was received by 22 of the 23 Setas
in 2006/07 alone - and they have yet to show they are capable of
producing people with the skills that our economy needs, or of
fulfilling the promises that have been made to the young South
Africans who have placed their hopes for the future in these training
programmes," said DA spokeswoman on labour Anchen Dreyer.

"SETAs are operating as sausage machines, concerned only with making
their learnership uptake figures look good. They give little or no
consideration to ensuring that these learners actually acquire skills
and find employment, to the point where it is impossible to find
information on some of the outcomes targets they are supposed to
meet."

Dreyer said that the DA had attempted to find out exactly what the
facts were regarding the number of learnerships available, how many
had been completed, the number of South Africans who had been
successful in finding employment after completing learnerships, and
any other evidence of the success, or failure, of these institutions.

"However, it proved to be a difficult task to get the information we
needed. Initially, the DA attempted to obtain the information needed
via detailed parliamentary questions. The Labour Minister asserted
that all the information was contained in SETA annual reports," said
Dreyer.

Dreyer said that the 2006/07 reports only confirmed the DA's
conviction that SETAs are largely ineffective. The reports revealed an
overall underperformances by most of the SETAs as National Skills
Development Strategy (NSDS) indicators were regularly and repeatedly
not attained.

"Only the Energy SETA provided adequate information to enable us to
assess performance across all National Skills Development Strategy
indicators. The DA questions the basis on which the government
continues to pour in money into SETAs without knowing what is coming
out of them - this kind of scenario makes impact assessment
impossible," she said.

"Therefore, the DA calls for a clean slate in skills development and
the scrapping of the Setas approach. We believe that industry badly
needs a training system that is demand-driven; hence we reiterate the
need to implement a system of tax rebates for skills development
efforts by employers."

"If adopted, this system would lead to a highly-adaptive and efficient
skills development system, as industry is best placed to respond to
trends and needs."

Read more on this story…click here >>>


Back to menu >>


ESKOM DOWNGRADING – DA CALLS FOR GOVERNMENT ACTION


In August, ratings agency Moody's Investors Services announced a cut
in State-owned Eskom's local and foreign currency ratings.

"In light of the downgrading of Eskom by Moody's Rating Agency, the DA
calls on the government to provide a clear plan on how it is going to
help Eskom raise the R343 billion for its capital expansion programme
without resorting to tariff increases," said DA spokesperson on public
enterprises Manie van Dyk.

"Government is the only shareholder in Eskom and should thus adopt
actions that will bolster the utility's plummeting credit rating, and
ensure that the South African public is receiving the service from
Eskom it deserves."

Van Dyk said that one of the prerequisites for economic growth in any
industrialised economy was the presence of predictable and sustainable
electricity supply. In the long run, not being able to ensure a steady
supply of electricity would pose a threat to South Africa's growth
prospects.

"The Government must therefore take immediate action to ensure that
Eskom's capital expenditure programme is not compromised by the credit
or investment downgrading," he said.

"There is no doubt that the power outages that South Africa witnessed
at the end of last year are the outcome of government's neglect of our
electricity generation infrastructure over the past decade. The DA
therefore calls for the government to abandon its usual laissez-faire
attitude and immediately release the first tranche of the R60 billion
it committed to Eskom – and allay fears over insecure funding for the
power utility."

Van Dyk said that the DA was strongly opposed to any unjustifiable
tariff hikes as these were likely to have a substantial effect on
inflation and hence monetary policy.

Back to menu >>


DA CALLS ON SAA CEO AND BOARD CHAIRMAN TO ACCOUNT FOR FINANCIAL WOES
AT THE NATIONAL CARRIER

In July, the DA wrote to the Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee
for Public Enterprises to request that SAA Chief Executive Officer
Khaya Ngqula, SAA Board Chairman Professor Jakes Gerwel and Manager
for Major Maintenance Reinhard Rohm be called to appear before the
committee.

DA spokesperson on public enterprises Manie van Dyk said that the CEO
and the Board Chairman needed to account for SAA's request for a R3
billion bail-out from the National Treasury and the airline's
retrenchment of 1 192 employees in the past financial year - when in
the same year SAA had a vacancy of 240 technicians.

"They also need to explain the resignation of 53 pilots and 217
technicians from SAA in 2007/08 despite their being awarded retention
premiums to the tune of R4 million," he said.

Van Dyk said that, after several years of receiving rescue packages
from Treasury to prop it up, SAA had reportedly requested a further R3
billion for this financial year to help offset losses sustained in the
last financial year - in which it ran a R1.09 billion loss. In the
midst of these huge losses, there were allegations that hefty bonuses
had been paid out to top executives.

"SAA must publicly explain why the rescue plan it implemented last
year has failed, and what it now plans to do in order to prevent more
money - which could be better spent on poverty alleviation, hospitals
or housing - from being used to shore it up in the face of these
losses."

"The high vacancy-rate for technicians is also worrisome given that
the majority of South Africa's domestic airlines make use of South
African Airways Technical (SAAT) – SAA's aircraft service and
maintenance arm. Cursory investigations by the DA in 2007 revealed
that SAA-serviced airlines are responsible for most technical
incidents," said Van Dyk.

"With 2010 just around the corner, it is of great importance that
SAA's service facilities and service levels are beyond reproach and
ready to take on the many demands which will be made of them."

Back to menu >>

REAL PICTURE BEHIND 2008 'DEVELOPMENTAL INDICATORS' NOT SO ROSY

The 2008 'Development Indicators' released by the Presidency in July
are based on a series of cherry-picked information, carefully selected
in order to ensure they reflect well on government, without giving due
and honest consideration to the true realities confronting the
development of South Africa today, said the Democratic Alliance in
July.

"The DA is particularly concerned that government has attempted to
create a misleading picture with respect to a number of issues," said
DA Chief Whip Ian Davidson.

"For example, the Development Indicators report quotes Labour Force
Survey statistics to show that narrowly-defined unemployment figures
have decreased to 23.1% up until September 2007, but fails to mention
that broadly defined unemployment rate - including discouraged work
seekers - is still in excess of 36%."

Davidson said that economic growth is predicted at a slightly higher
pace than the AsgiSA target of 4.5%, despite Finance Minister Trevor
Manuel reiterating Treasury's growth expectation for the country to be
no more than 4%.

"This must also be read against a number of other forecasts that peg
South Africa's growth for the year as closer to 2%."

He also said that there was much more room for growth and job creation
to bring the economy in step with other middle-income countries, which
had been growing at an average rate of 7% or more since 2004, but this
would not happen if the government did not evaluate its success
against comparable countries so that their successes could be
duplicated.

"A typical example is the relative complexity of South Africa's
red-tape regime, which hampers business growth-promoting and
job-creating business transactions. In 2006, we ranked 28 out of 178
countries in the Ease of Doing Business index only to slip to 35th
place in 2008, which means that the economy is becoming less
competitive as an investment destination."

"If the government cannot be open about these realities, complacency
will set in. This will only be to the detriment of the people."

Back to menu >>

DA CALLS FOR URGENT REMOVAL OF IMPORT QUOTAS ON CHINESE TEXTILES

In July, the Democratic Alliance called for the urgent removal of
import quotas on Chinese textiles and the introduction of a Customized
Sector Programme (CSP).

"The DA has repeatedly pointed out that the implementation of import
quotas on Chinese textile and clothing items is detrimental to the
local clothing and textile industry, citing closures of countless cut,
make and trim operations (CMTs)," said DA spokesperson on finance
Kobus Marais.

"Three months ago, the DA asked the Minister of Trade and Industry to
review import quotas on Chinese textile and clothing items with a view
to lifting them. Today, these quotas still stand and the textile
industry continues to be in distress. It is reported that 4700 jobs
have been lost this year alone and that hundreds more may soon follow.
The Western Cape Province is reporting closure of 24 factories."

Marais said that the Minister of Trade and Industry, by forcing
through trade restrictions without putting in place alternative
measures to assist the manufacturers in the clothing sector, must now
shoulder the blame for the clothing and textile industry's woes.

"Given that unemployment is currently estimated at around 23%, every
job in the economy has to be saved. The clothing industry creates
three times as many jobs as the economy-wide average; thus making the
industry a strategic sector for employment creation," he said.

"The Minister of Trade Industry must urgently explain what steps his
department is taking to help ensure the continued existence of a
vibrant and commercially viable textile industry in South Africa."

Back to menu >>

DA WELCOMES LAUNCH OF VENTURE CAPITAL FUND TO AID ENTREPRENEURS

The launch by VenFin of a venture capital fund called InVenFin, aimed
at supporting entrepreneurs in the development and growth of their
intellectual property, is an excellent initiative, said the Democratic
Alliance in July.

"The fund is a good example of independent institutions providing the
space and showing the will to act for the establishment of a better
South Africa. Private sector participation in public sector
initiatives is a key tenet of the DA's vision of an Open Opportunity
Society for All," said DA spokesperson on trade and industry Pierre
Rabie.

"Entrepreneurship and the development of small-to medium-sized
businesses is an essential element for driving growth and job
creation. Therefore, any new and creative ways to fund such
entrepreneurial activity should be welcomed."

Rabie said that private initiatives which supported innovation were in
line with empirical economic findings which had shown a "...growing
awareness among policymakers that innovation is the main driver of
economic progress and well being…" In addition, innovation had also
been noted to be a crucial determinant of competitiveness.

"This initiative by VenFin is therefore very timely, given that South
Africa has been ranked 53rd out of 55 countries on the 2008 World
Competitiveness Scoreboard, a three point drop from the previous
year's ranking," Rabie said.

Back to menu >>

DID YOU KNOW?
• In 2007, SAA and its subsidiary Mango received over R2 billion in
state funds as a form of capital injection. This was after the
Competition Commission fined SAA over R45 million for engaging in
anti-competitive behaviour by giving incentives to travel agents.
• SAA ran at a R1.09 billion loss in the same year.
• Also in 2007, SAA left Transnet with a R9 billion debt it had
incurred to close out its disastrous foreign currency hedges. It has
yet to repay this debt.
• The years preceding 2007 paint an even bleaker financial state of
affairs. In 2004, SAA recorded a loss of over R8.7 billion, with a
R5.9 billion loss for the previous financial year.

A note from Helen...

Erasmus Commission verdict a victory for constitutionalism

On Monday, the Cape High Court ruled that the Erasmus Commission of
Inquiry, appointed by former Premier Ebrahim Rasool to investigate
matters arising out of the City of Cape Town's investigation of
Councillor Badih Chaaban, is unlawful and unconstitutional.
When I stated that I would challenge the legality of the Erasmus
Commission, by going to court if necessary, the Multi-Party Government
of the City of Cape Town was criticised for trying to cover up alleged
wrongdoing, and both the DA and I were accused of becoming embroiled
in a narrow, local issue.
The Court's recent verdict shows that these criticisms were without foundation.
Looking back on the entire saga, the bottom line is this: Neither the
City of Cape Town nor the DA was involved in any illegal spying. The
City did not pay any account on behalf of the DA. The City and the DA
were entirely open with the police investigation, which did not result
in any charge. It was wrong for the Premier, as a politician, to usurp
the role of the police, the prosecutor and the courts, by trying to
set up a commission, with a political agenda, to discredit the DA and
the Multi-Party Government of the City. It was wrong for a judge, the
Police Commissioner and others to allow themselves to be abused in
this process. The Commission breached the principle of the separation
of powers, and was unconstitutional.
An important aspect of the Cape High Court's judgement is that it has
set a precedent that will have to be respected in future.
Yesterday in Parliament I spelt out the implications in a statement, below.
Best Wishes


STATEMENT BY HELEN ZILLE
LEADER OF THE DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE

Erasmus Commission verdict must have consequences for those complicit
in the abuse of power
3 September 2008
The ruling on Monday in the Cape High Court – that the Erasmus
Commission of Inquiry was unlawful and unconstitutional – is a victory
for constitutional democracy in South Africa. It sends out a signal to
the African National Congress (ANC) that the abuse of state power can
not and will not be tolerated; and that the ruling party must not put
its narrow political interests ahead of the Constitution.
The verdict has five major national implications for constitutionalism.
Firstly, it represents a watershed judgment on the constitutional
principle of the separation of powers, by stating that the appointment
of a serving judge to chair the Commission was incompatible with that
principle, and was therefore unlawful.
Furthermore, the High Court ruled that the terms of reference of the
Commission had effectively given the judge prosecutorial powers, which
was itself a gross violation of the principle of separation of powers.
Secondly, the ruling corroborates the principles of co-operative
government and intergovernmental relations set out in Section 41 of
the Constitution.
These principles state that: "All spheres of government and all organs
of state within each sphere must…respect the constitutional status,
institutions, powers and functions of government in the other spheres"
and "not assume any power or function except those conferred on them
in terms of the Constitution".
By appointing the Erasmus Commission, the former Premier of the
Western Cape, Ebrahim Rasool, overstepped the powers of his office and
those of his provincial administration as they are set out in the
Constitution. In doing so, he disrespected the constitutional status
and powers of the City of Cape Town.
As the High Court judgment catalogues, the City did everything in its
power to co-operate with the provincial government in resolving our
dispute, as Section 41 (3) of the Constitution requires. The
provincial administration, by contrast, systematically violated the
constitutional principle of co-operative government by abusing its
power in an attempt to damage the City.
Thirdly, the ruling shows that a vital democratic institution – the
judiciary – is prepared and willing to check the abuse of state power.
At a time when the ANC is increasingly acting without regard to the
constitutional constraints on its power, and in contempt of the system
of checks and balances designed to enforce these limitations, this
sets an important precedent for the future.
Fourthly, the verdict deals a body blow to the increasingly popular
notion that the ruling party should be able to bypass the courts and
the due process of law in pursuing its own narrow political agenda.
That idea underpins the call for ANC President Jacob Zuma's corruption
trial to be halted, and for him to be given a special political deal
instead.
Fifthly, the ruling upholds the constitutional imperative of judicial
independence in finding that the Commission should not have been
headed by a judge. The Court declared that it was inappropriate for a
judge to head a commission of inquiry which was so clearly political
in nature, as this risked compromising the independence of the
judiciary.
The Erasmus Commission was a blatant abuse of power.
The Court found that Rasool did not have the power in law to appoint
the Erasmus Commission. This vindicates the belief held by the City of
Cape Town that it was both illegal and in bad faith for the Premier,
via the Commission, to try to take on the power of the police by
conducting a criminal investigation.
Instead of pursuing a legal and constitutional route, Rasool chose to
wage a political smear campaign against the Democratic Alliance-led
Multi-Party government. After his initial attempts stalled and the
first Erasmus Commission was disbanded, he re-appointed the Commission
with an expanded mandate.
But, like its precursor, the second Erasmus Commission was an
unconstitutional political hit squad, whose aim it was to do as much
damage as possible, through slur and innuendo, to me personally in the
run-up to the 2009 elections, with the aim of preventing the party I
lead from winning the Western Cape.
The Erasmus Commission was never about defending the law; it was about
defending the ANC's political interests. As the judgment states:
Rasool's "only motive on the evidence in establishing the second
Erasmus Commission, must have been to embarrass or discredit political
opponents, particularly the DA".
When I signalled my intention to resist the Erasmus Commission, the
ANC, much of the media, and several commentators suggested that both
the Democratic Alliance and the Multi-Party Government of the City of
Cape Town had something to hide. They even argued that I was becoming
bogged down in local issues, and used this as a pretext to argue that
I could not combine my dual functions as Mayor or Cape Town and Leader
of the Democratic Alliance.
But my opposition to the Erasmus Commission was never aimed at
concealing anything; otherwise, why would I have asked Advocate Josie
Jordaan SC to conduct an exhaustive inquiry into whether the City had
broken any law in the process of its investigation into Councillor
Badih Chaaban?
Furthermore, despite an exhaustive police investigation over many
months, no evidence emerged that the City of Cape Town or the DA had
engaged in illegal spying. The City opened up all its files to the
police to investigate, and held nothing back. If there had been any
substance to these allegations of illegal spying, charges would have
been laid.
My goal in opposing the Erasmus Commission was to expose it for what
it really was – a political witch-hunt by the ANC, which fundamentally
undermined the Constitution. I believed then, and it is a belief that
has now been vindicated by the Cape High Court, that by resisting the
Commission, we would be defending the Constitution and demonstrating
to the ANC that it could not lightly get away with abusing state
power.
As a result of the recent judgment, I have taken the following steps:
Firstly, I have asked my Party's representative on the Judicial
Service Commission (JSC) to approach that body with a view to
investigating whether Judge Nathan Erasmus is guilty of misconduct.
According to the judgment, "the involvement of Erasmus J in the
commission has unnecessarily involved the judge in the political
controversy surrounding the commission, which may damage the
confidence of the public in the judiciary's core function of
determining matters in court".
Not only did Judge Erasmus compromise himself, and the integrity of
the judicial system, by agreeing to chair the Commission in the first
place. In so doing he disregarded the guidelines accepted by the
Constitutional Court to prevent this kind of abuse.
Moreover, he also acted unlawfully by giving a so-called "interim
report" to Rasool when the Commission was about to be reconstituted.
This report contained confidential information, such as my cell phone
records, which had been illegally subpoenaed, and which have now, no
doubt, been disseminated in the ANC.
For these two reasons, I believe that Judge Erasmus may have a case to
answer for to the JSC.
Secondly, the DA's Chief Whip, Ian Davidson, has written to the
Minister in the Presidency, Kgalema Motlanthe, and asked him to
dismiss Ebrahim Rasool, whom he recently appointed to advise him on
his work in Parliament.
As a public servant, Rasool is required by the Constitution to promote
and maintain "a high standard of professional ethics". However, in the
light of the Cape High Court judgment, it is clear that he is unfit
for this form of public office.
It is inappropriate for Minister Motlanthe to be advised by someone
like Rasool, and if Motlanthe is to become the next President or
Deputy President of this country – as it is has been suggested in some
quarters – it is only right that he demonstrates his probity and
suitability for these positions by acting decisively now against the
mal-administrators in his midst.
Thirdly, I have written to the Public Protector, asking him to
investigate whether the Erasmus Commission constituted an abuse of
public funds. The Public Protector is obliged in terms of the
Constitution to "investigate any conduct in state affairs, or in the
public administration in any sphere of government, that is alleged or
suspected to be improper or to result in impropriety or prejudice".
The Cape High Court judgment provides ample prima facie evidence of
such impropriety.
Finally, in the provincial legislature, our representatives have
called on Police Commissioner Mzwandile Petros to resign, in light of
the fact that he acted illegally when he passed on to Rasool
information that the police obtained in a search of the home of
private investigator Philip du Toit. According to the court ruling,
that information should have been fully investigated by the police and
then handed to the director of public prosecutions.
Petros must appear before a standing committee to explain his conduct.
In addition, we will submit questions to assess how much the Erasmus
Commission has cost the taxpayer. Our legal advisors are also
currently assessing whether Rasool, or any other public official, is
personally liable in terms of the Public Finance Management Act.
The decision by the Cape High Court to declare the Erasmus Commission
unlawful and invalid was a landmark ruling for constitutional
democracy. As such, it will have repercussions far beyond the City of
Cape Town – by reaffirming the supremacy of the Constitution and by
rejecting the abuse of state power. We knew from the start that the
Erasmus Commission was illegal, unconstitutional, and politically
motivated. That is why we opposed it so implacably. Now that the Court
has passed judgment, we must see remedial action – along the lines I
have outlined – to ensure that power is never again abused in this
way.

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

Radio Pretoria se 15de verjaarsdag

Donderdag,18 September 2008, is Radio Pretoria vyftien jaar jonk. Van
die vyftien jaar het die Radio vir elf jaar lank 'n verbete stryd
gevoer om aan die lewe te bly. Aanvanklik was dit die verkryging van
'n lisensie wat sake moeilik gemaak het en toe die eerste eenjaar
lisensie uitgereik is, was die Radio finansieel so geknak dat
voortgang bykans onmoontlik sou wees.

Vandag, vyftien jaar later, word Radio Pretoria se stem nie net in
Transvaal gehoor nie. Die helder boodskap van u eie Radio kan ook per
satelliet gehoor word oor die ganse Suider Afrika. Die internet
uitsendings is wêreldwyd hoorbaar, en Radio Pretoria het luisteraars
van Rusland, tot die Falkland, in Kanada, die VSA, Europa, China tot
in Australasia.

Op Saterdag, 20 September 2008, word die vyftiende verjaarsdag
feestelik gevier daar op Kleinfontein waar die nuwe, 100 meter hoë
uitsaaitoring na die wolke reik.

As u u kan vereenselwig met Radio Pretoria, kom dan en geniet die dag
saam met ons. Daar sal musiek, lekkernye en Radio Pretoria aandenkings
te koop wees. Daar gaan baie mense wees, almal teenwoordig se name
gaan op 'n massiewe rol ingeskryf word om bewaar te word vir die jare
wat kom…….

Bring die hele familie, genoeg stoele en dalk 'n sambreel as
beskutting teen die hitte van die Afrika son.

Sien jou daar – Saterdag 20 September 2008 – ons gaan 9.00 vm begin!

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

DA@WORK 1 September - Democracy would fail without an Opposition

DA@WORK 1 September

THE OPPOSITION IS THE CONSTITUTION'S FIERCEST PROTECTOR
The ANC like so many other liberation movements that had tried to
become political parties, believed it had the monopoly on morality and
a divine right to rule

DA CALLS FOR SCRAPPING OF SCORPIONS BILLS
More than 50% of submissions oppose the closure of the Scorpions – 134
submissions out of a total of 247.

NAVY AFTER BILLIONS TO ACQUIRE MORE VESSELS
It was reported in the press last week that the Navy wanted to spend
billions of rands of taxpayers' money on acquiring new patrol ships.

NEW PARLIAMENTARY TERM MAKES PROPER DEBATE IMPOSSIBLE
The new programme means that about 20 pieces of legislation will have
to be passed in just four days instead of a fortnight, a period which
the DA previously argued was already way too short.

QUOTE OF THE WEEK

"Sunday evening's Isha'a prayer marks the start of the holy month of
Ramadaan, the most venerated and blessed month of the Islamic year. I
would like to wish all Muslims a blessed fast during this period of
reflection, self-discipline, sacrifice, and sympathy for those who are
less fortunate."

DA Leader Helen Zille wishes Muslims well for the holy fast of
Ramadan, which began yesterday.

THE OPPOSITION IS THE CONSTITUTION'S FIERCEST PROTECTOR

The ANC like so many other liberation movements that had tried to
become political parties, believed it had the monopoly on morality and
a divine right to rule, said DA leader Helen Zille last Thursday. She
was presenting the C.R. Swart memorial lecture at the University of
the Free State.

"The quest for absolute power makes internal conflict for positions of
power inevitable and vicious, and the ruling cabal then seeks to
eliminate challenges to its control from within and without."

"It begins to use the instruments of the Constitution, not only
against the opposition, but against challenges it faces inside its own
party," she said.

She said that the country was subject to power-hungry individuals
pretending they exemplified the liberation struggle, and invoking it
to justify the seizure of constitutional instruments that are actually
supposed to limit their power.

She said the role of the opposition in these cases was deceptively
simple to describe but exceptionally difficult to fulfil.

"We must convince more and more South Africans that it is in their
interests to protect the Constitution from the ruling party's abuse of
power."

"Our role is to offer real policy alternatives that provide real
opportunities for all who are prepared to use them to improve their
lives, and where there is a link between effort and reward."

"We must be a catalyst that brings together all those who understand
that limits on power are essential for the welfare of the people, so
that South Africa can become a sustainable democracy with a growing
economy," she said.

It was thus the DA's goal to realign politics and re-shape the
configuration of political parties, drawing a clear line between those
who believe in constitutionalism and those who do not.

She said that this realignment would not hinge on opposition parties
alone as there were many within the ANC who fought to defend the
constitution and were appalled by the growing trend of
anti-constitutionalism in their own party

She said it was vital to protect the constitution by preventing the
ANC from gaining a two-thirds majority in the next election.

"Apart from our role as opposition, we must also strive to demonstrate
what we can do in government and show that our alternative is
genuinely better, for all the people."

"We started this process by winning power in Cape Town in 2006 and in
other local authorities, primarily in the Western Cape and we need to
build on this base in 2009, by winning the Western Cape and showing
what aligned co-operative governance can achieve between a provincial
administration and local authorities."

"The ANC can be dislodged from power. The Constitution can prevail.
It depends on us. We can learn through our own bitter experience, or
we can use the opportunity of learning from the experience of others,
and apply the relevant lessons to our own situation," Zille said.


DA CALLS FOR SCRAPPING OF SCORPIONS BILLS

The Democratic Alliance last Wednesday called for the unconditional
and immediate scrapping of the two Bills intended to disband the
Scorpions.

"The DA is in possession of the final list of public submissions on
the closure of the successful organised crime fighting unit, the
Scorpions, and the clear majority - 54% - oppose the closure," said
party safety and security spokesperson, Dianne Kohler Barnard.

During the public submissions process, chairperson of the Justice
Portfolio committee Yunus Carrim had stated in the media that were
they to establish through the public hearings that the overwhelming
majority of South Africans wanted the Scorpions retained, they would
take it seriously.

Kohler Barnard said that despite the chairpersons' attempts to
engineer the public participation processes in support of the ANC's
resolution to shut down the Scorpions, their efforts had failed.

"More than 50% of submissions oppose the closure of the Scorpions –
134 submissions out of a total of 247," she said.

"It is inexplicable that only 247 submissions have made it into the
final report, despite the DA alone submitting 7,978 written
submissions by the deadline and many other submissions being sent
directly by the public."

"It is clear that the portfolio committees have excluded the bulk of
these submissions in an attempt to downplay the extent of the public
outrage at the decision to disband the unit."

She said that the party had written to the speaker asking that a
special inquiry be made into the issue of discarded submissions on 5
August 2008, but had not received a reply.

She added that the DA had written to Mr Carrim challenging him to act
on his previous statement and to withdraw both Bills with immediate
effect.

"There is a need for urgency given that provisional dates have already
been set for the Second Reading on the two bills," she added.

NAVY AFTER BILLIONS TO ACQUIRE MORE VESSELS

The request by the SA Navy to buy more ships only served to highlight
the fatal flaws of the arms deal, the Democratic Alliance said last
Thursday.

"This is further proof that the entire arms deal procurement process
was fatally flawed," said DA spokesperson for defence Rafeek Shah.

It was reported in the press last week that the Navy wanted to spend
billions of rands of taxpayers' money on acquiring new patrol ships.

According to the report, a staff paper commissioned on behalf of chief
of the navy vice-admiral Johannes Mudimu, from the SA National Defence
Force's legal services stated that the navy "critically" required new
ships.

Shah said that South Africans already had to fork out close to
R20-billion for corvettes and submarines acquired as part of the arms
deal.

"These purchases have turned out to be very expensive white elephants," he said.

"The fact that the navy now believes that it needs a number of
85-metre multi-purpose patrol boats at a cost of R300-million each to
help defend our waters and protect our waters illustrates how
inappropriate it was to buy the corvettes and submarines in the first
place," said the party.

The DA said that had less money been spent on the arms deal ships,
more funds would have been left over to ensure that the Navy had
sufficient resources to fulfil its mandate.

"Given the argument contained in the report, that the Navy is
struggling to meet its obligations with its existing weaponry...the
Navy must now once and for all abandon any thought it had of
exercising its option to purchase a fifth corvette," said Shah.

The party added that consideration to acquire new weaponry should only
be given if the Navy could provide the assurance that there would be
qualified personnel to operate them and that the purchase was carried
out in an open and transparent fashion.

Shah said he would pose parliamentary questions to defence Minister
Mosiuoa Lekota including whether government was aware of the Navy's
request.


NEW PARLIAMENTARY TERM MAKES PROPER DEBATE IMPOSSIBLE

Parliament was being turned into nothing more than a
'sausage-factory', compelling MPs to process about five bills a day,
according to Democratic Alliance chief whip Ian Davidson.

He was reacting to ANC proposals to cut short the already
much-shortened parliamentary programme, leaving MPs to process some 20
pieces of legislation in less than a week.

This would mean MPs get very little time to debate contentious
legislation. The DA is also unhappy that there will be no chance to
question ministers in the house.

Davidson has written to National Assembly speaker Baleka Mbete asking
her to intervene so that MPs get more time to do their work at
parliament this year.

"I am sure you are well aware of the constitutional obligation that
Parliament has both of holding the executive to account at all times,
and of ensuring that a proper process is followed when passing
legislation; one which includes thorough public consultation and
input," he wrote.

"It is clear that the programme proposed by the ANC, if implemented,
will undermine both these functions and will turn Parliament into
nothing more than a rubber stamp."

"I trust as Speaker of Parliament and as chairperson of the National
Assembly programming committee you also view this problem in a serious
light.

"I am therefore writing to request that you intervene as a matter of
urgency in this situation so that the number of sitting days is
increased in order to ensure that legislation is properly debated and
considered before it is passed; and also so that oral question
sessions are included in the rest of this year's parliamentary
programme," Davidson wrote.

The new programme means that about 20 pieces of legislation will have
to be passed in just four days instead of a fortnight, a period which
the DA previously argued was already way too short.

There will be no oral question sessions for the rest of the year.

"If this programme is implemented, it will see key pieces of
legislation such as the two Scorpions bills being passed in September
with opposition parties only allocated six minutes, at most, to debate
them," Davidson commented.

Key legislation scheduled to be passed during this one week includes
the Provision of Land and Assistance Amendment Bill - which would give
the Minister of Agriculture and Land Affairs sweeping powers to
acquire agricultural companies and equipment for land reform
beneficiaries - and the South African Police Services Amendment Bill
and National Prosecuting Authority Amendment Bill - which would
dissolve the Scorpions.

Davidson claimed that the new programme undermined both parliament's
constitutional obligation to ensure that the executive was held
accountable for its decisions and actions, and its obligation to
ensure that a proper process was followed when passing legislation -
including public consultation and input from all political parties.


DID YOU KNOW?

A reply to a DA parliamentary question in the Limpopo Provincial
Legislature revealed that 65% of senior managers in the provincial
government are not qualified for their jobs.

According to the reply, two out of every three senior managers in
Limpopo do not have the appropriate qualifications for their jobs. The
reply further shows that:

• 34 senior managers in the provincial government only have matric;
• 5 senior managers do not have matric;
• At least 16 senior managers have a teacher's diploma;
• 60% of senior managers in the Provincial Treasury do not have matric.
• All senior managers in the Department of Roads and Transport have a
matric certificate only.

EYE ON CRIME

GO GLENISTER!
http://www.eyeoncrime.co.za/?q=node/423

RESIDENTIAL INTRUSIONS – MODUS OPERANDI
http://www.eyeoncrime.co.za/?q=node/422

WISH THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THE ANC FELT THE SAME WAY….
http://www.eyeoncrime.co.za/?q=node/424

"WAR ROOM" BRINGS IN THE BAD GUYS
http://www.eyeoncrime.co.za/?q=node/421


In this week's edition of our weekly newsletter, <a
href="http://realanctoday.wordpress.com/2008/08/29/little-by-little/"
target="_blank">The Real ANC Today</a>, we ask the question: is the
ANC of 2008 the same party it was in 1994? And, if not, how - and,
perhaps more importantly, when - did it change? Click on the link to
read this week's newsletter, to subscribe to the RSS feed, or to
subscribe by e-mail. Below each story you also have a chance to
comment. Tell us what you think.